Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 2 proposal v13

[Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>]

Just two minor comments now... see inline in attached document.

   Simon

Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> Attached.
> 
> Included Dave's inlined changes, addressed his comments (except the ones 
> related to URI values -- see my response to his email), fixed 
> indentation of examples, fixed one UUID for request messages (in the 
> examples) to make them all unique, addressed all of SimonN's comments.
> 
> Looking at v13, there are a few things that are worded in an awkward 
> way, since the origin of this proposal lies in trying to get a 
> directional proposal so that the TC could agree on the protocol 
> elements/how it works. But we have moved on to agreeing on exact 
> wordings. I think this is purely editorial and can be fixed later (as PR 
> comments) so won't bother with making/suggesting any changes now.
> 
> With this, I believe all the outstanding comments except one (see below) 
> are addressed. I'm hoping we can resolve issue 2 with this.
> 
> The only outstanding issue is whether to change 'SCA reference' to 
> something like 'the invoker' or 'the client' so that non-SCA clients can 
> use it.
> 
> -Anish
> -- 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v13+simon.doc