Re: [sca-bindings] Updated proposal for BINDINGS-54 - proposal rev#9

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

Attempt #9, addressing the concerns the Simon raised.

Simon Nash wrote:
> Eric Johnson wrote:
>> OK, one more try.
>>
>> Simon Nash wrote:
>>
>>> 3. Under point 1 in the algorithm for reference URIs, the second
>>>    sentence is redundant (assuming the change in item 1 above)
>>>    and should be removed.
>> Agreed.  The change I made here was to remove the RFC 2119 language.  I
>> thought it useful to remind the reader.  I've left this as is in my
>> latest revision.
> >
> I think the third bullet makes this extrememly clear.  Having the
> same information twice in the same list seems more confusing to me.
I've made the edits as you suggested.
>
>>> 4. With the new prohibition on using any combinations of @uri,
>>>    endpointReference, @wsdlElement/wsdl.port and
>>> @wsdlElement/wsdl.service,
>>>    points 1, 2 and 3 of the algorithm for reference URIs are now
>>>    mutually exclusive.  This means we no longer need to use an
>>>    algorithm with ordered steps.
>> I thought about this, and almost changed it with the 07 draft.  Since
>> you noticed this as well, I've now changed it.
> >
> I don't think we still need the reference to "first step"
> before the bullets.  It's also no longer appropriate to refer to
> "above steps" after the bullet.  We should be able to collapse the
> text before and after the bullet into a single normative rule, as
> follows:
>
>  For a reference binding, the SCA runtime MUST apply the appropriate
>  rule from the following, or raise an error:
>
>  <the bullets follow>
I've changed this around, although I did not employ your exact wording.

-Eric.

sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd02-issue54-proposal-09.doc