Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-112: BWS20004 wording is incorrect

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-112

-Eric.

On 02/10/2010 03:55 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> Title: BWS20004 wording is incorrect
>
> Spec: WS Binding
>
> Description:
> BWS20004 says --
> "If the wsdl.service form of wsdlElement is used on an SCA reference
> binding, the set of available ports for the reference MUST contain at
> least one port."
>
> The statement as written is incorrect. The set of available ports is
> for a reference *binding*. As a side, 'at least one port' is a little
> awkward. It is better to say non-empty.
>
> Proposal:
>
> Change BWS20004 to --
> "If the wsdl.service form of wsdlElement is used on an SCA reference
> binding, the set of available ports for the reference *binding* MUST
> *be non-empty*."
>
>
> -Anish
> -- 
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php