Re: [sca-bindings] binding.ws - a new Issue?

[Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>]

Mike,

The service variant has the following
definition:

If the binding is for an SCA reference,
the set of available ports for the reference consists of the ports in the
WSDL service that have portTypes which are compatible supersets of the
SCA reference as defined in the SCA Assembly Model specification [SCA-Assembly]
and satisfy all the policy constraints of the binding.

So the port type compatibility is build
into the normative statements via the "set of available ports".
 The service form cannot be used on an SCA service so I think that
all cases are already covered.

Regards, Simon

Simon Holdsworth

From:	Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB
To:	"OASIS Bindings" <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	01/06/2010 13:12
Subject:	[sca-bindings] binding.ws - a new Issue?

---

Folks, 

In writing the testcases for binding.ws I note that for the @wsdlElement
attribute, there are normative statements relating to the
Binding and Port variants which require the associated portType to be compatible
with the interface used for the service or 
reference element to which <binding.ws/> is attached.

However, there is no such requirement for the Service variant of @wsdlElement.

Is this intentional, or is there a hole here and do we need to add one
or more normative statements to the Service variant?


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU