Re: [sca-bindings] [BINDINGS-160] BWS50013's target is a WSDL 1.1.document, is that appropriate?

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

+1

I would like to also keep the current wordings as well, with 'MUST NOT' 
replaced by 'cannot' or something equivalent.

-Anish
--

On 5/12/2011 3:46 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> The target of this normative statement is the WSDL document related to a
> service or to a reference.
>
> Proposal:
>
> Reword BWS50013 to read:
>
> "A WSDL 1.1 portType element associated with an SCA service or reference
> MUST NOT have the
> WSCallback policy assertion attached"
>
> "associated with" is intended to cover both the referencing of a
> concrete WSDL document from within
> an SCA XML document (by any element) and also cover the dynamic creation
> and advertising of a
> WSDL by a runtime service.
>
> <we can even add these explanatory words if necessary>
>
>
> Yours, Mike
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr Mike Edwards 	Mail Point 137, Hursley Park 	
> STSM 	Winchester, Hants SO21 2JN
> SCA & Services Standards 	United Kingdom
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC 		
> IBM Software Group 		
> Phone: 	+44-1962 818014 		
> Mobile: 	+44-7802-467431 (274097) 		
> e-mail: 	mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com 		
>
>
>
>
>
> From: 	Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
> To: 	OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Date: 	12/05/2011 05:52
> Subject: 	[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: BWS50013's target is a WSDL 1.1.
> document, is that appropriate?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Title: BWS50013's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is that appropriate?
>
> Spec: sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd04
>
> Description:
>
> BWS50013 states --
> The following is the list of WSDL/1.1 elements whose scope contains the
> Policy Subjects allowed for a WSCallback policy assertion but which MUST
> NOT have WSCallback policy assertions attached: wsdl:portType [BWS50013]
>
> We haven't defined WSDL 1.1 as a conformance target.
>
> Proposal:
>
> We could go one of two ways, we could define WSDL 1.1 as a target OR we
> could refactor this to state that such policy assertions cannot occur on
> wsdl:portType without using RFC2119 keywords, and add a requirement that
> says that for a SCA WS Binding XML document to be conformant any
> referred WSDL 1.1 portType from that document MUST NOT have the callback
> policy assertion attached.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>