[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] [Comment] Web Services Binding specification -optional conformance points
On 6/2/2011 9:10 AM, Mike Edwards wrote: > > Folks, > > Somehow I think that we have overlooked the Web Services binding spec > when considering optional normative statements. > > So this email is intended to kick start the discussion, which will lead > to some issues, I think. > > The following is a list of optional normative statements in > sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd04.doc: > > BWS20022 (see also BWS20023) > BWS20029 > BWS20030 > BWS20034 > BWS20036 > BWS40007 > BWS50014 > BWS50015 > > There are also the Section 6 Conformance items to consider: > > Section 6.4 Item 2 > Section 6.4 Item 3 > > Plus the whole question of WSCB support > - do we have 2 implementations? - if not we have to split the spec :-( > Splitting has been my preferred solution all along :-) It does not hold up progress on the main spec and becomes a much more friendly/accessible/composable WS-* spec. -Anish --
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]