[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Unformatted minutes of July 31 TC call
Unformatted minutes of July 31 TC call: (See attached file: 2008-07-31.txt) *** No SCA-BPEL TC call in August - next call on September 4 *** Kind Regards DK
[17:03] anonymous morphed into anish [17:07] Sanjay: Agenda: [17:07] Sanjay: Agenda: 1. Roll Call http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/members/roster.php 2. Appointment of scribe Scribe list attached below 3. Agenda bashing 4. Approval of July 24, 2008 minutes http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200807/msg00031.html 5. Action items review http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/members/action_items.php a) AI #0021 Chairs - to follow up with Mary to post the CD docs to OASIS repository Done. Docs uploaded but SCA BPEL NS is not live yet. b) AI #0042 Editors to incorporate all issue resolutions by 10 July 2008 6. Higher bar for new issues 7. Issue 18 http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-18 TITLE- Need to rewrite the SCA-BPEL specifications with RFC-2119 keywords/statements Email discussion: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200807/msg00033.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200807/msg00034.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200807/msg00035.html 8. AOB [17:07] Dieter Koenig: Agenda bashing ... [17:07] Dieter Koenig: No objections [17:08] Dieter Koenig: Approval of July 24 minutes ... [17:08] Dieter Koenig: No objections - minutes approved [17:08] Dieter Koenig: Review of open action items ... [17:10] Dieter Koenig: AI 0021 - Anish will send one more reminder to Mary w.r.t. the remaining pieces [17:11] Dieter Koenig: AI 0042 - two more issue resolutions to be applied to the spec - Martin has the pen [17:12] Dieter Koenig: Agenda item 6 - higher bar for new issues ... [17:12] Dieter Koenig: Proposed for other SCA TCs as well [17:12] Dieter Koenig: Proposed approach: first set a higher bar for opening new issues [17:13] Dieter Koenig: TC to decide on a date and concrete approach for the higher bar [17:14] Dieter Koenig: Anish: SCA-J TC decided to set the date to September 15 [17:15] Dieter Koenig: (August is not appropriate due to the vacation season) [17:15] Dieter Koenig: Proposed approach: require 2/3 majority for opening new issues [17:19] anish can everyone who is not speaking go on mute? [17:20] Dieter Koenig: Dieter: motion to set the date to September 15 and require 2/3 majority for opening new issues - Mike R. seconds [17:21] Dieter Koenig: this means 2/3 of voters present in the call [17:22] Dieter Koenig: Martin: motion to change this to 2/3 of ALL voting members [17:23] Dieter Koenig: Ashok seconds [17:24] Dieter Koenig: (2/3 of ALL voting members would be consistent across SCA TCs) [17:24] anish: should we then do web ballots for new issues? [17:26] Dieter Koenig: Mike R: 2/3 of ALL voting members may not be reached with a unanimous vore of a quorate meeting [17:26] Dieter Koenig: s/vore/vote [17:27] Dieter Koenig: Voting on the amendment ... [17:27] Mike Edwards: +1 for the motion [17:27] Dieter Koenig: Y = 2/3 of ALL voting members [17:28] Dieter Koenig: Voting result: 8 Y, 1 N - amendment accepted [17:28] anish anyone else getting the clicking sound? [17:28] anish or just me? [17:29] Dave Booz we're all getting it [17:29] Dieter Koenig: Motion is therefore: set the date to September 15 and require 2/3 majority of all voting members for opening new issues [17:29] Dieter Koenig: Motion passed without objections [17:29] Dieter Koenig: Agenda item 7: Issue 18 ... [17:31] Mike Edwards: The "combination" process is the subject of an issue in the Assembly TC [17:34] Dieter Koenig: Mike R: a conformance target "SCA runtime" would include design time [17:35] Dieter Koenig: Martin: concentrate on the rules to be followed [17:37] Dieter Koenig: Anish: the SCA component type is not an "output artifact" [17:42] Dieter Koenig: Danny: we should use the "component type generator" conformance target [17:42] Mike Edwards: The other C&Is are in poor shape - I will be raising an issue against the Java TC for the CAA spe [17:45] Dieter Koenig: Sanjay: (1) there may be multiple component type side files (2) what should be the name of the conformance target? (3) how to test compliance? [17:45] Dieter Koenig: Sanjay: how about "component type information" as a candidate target? [17:48] Dieter Koenig: Anish: this would be too abstract as you cannot point to it [17:50] Dieter Koenig: Mike E: the test would consider an SCA component definition and a BPEL process definition - this must work [17:52] Dieter Koenig: Mike R: the component type and the introspected implementation must not be in conflict [17:53] Mike Edwards: Again, Michael R's testcase is a straighforward testcase [17:53] Mike Edwards: I just think it is the runtime that is tested here [17:58] Dieter Koenig: Danny: both SCDL and BPEL may be valid by themselves, but the relationship is not [17:58] Mike Edwards: The testcase is simple - it is a SCDL file + a BPEL script - it is either valid or it is not valid - and whichever runtime deals with the combination must get it right - process it or reject it with an error [17:59] anish: i agree, the issues is if it is rejected, what is at fault? [17:59] Mike Edwards: the runtime [17:59] Mike Edwards: what else is there [17:59] anish: k [18:00] Dieter Koenig: Mike R: motion to use proposal in revision 5 section 2.1 [18:01] Dieter Koenig: No second - motion rejected [18:01] anish: i think there are three cases: either the runtime is at fault, or the scdl is a fault or the CT side file is at fault [18:02] Dieter Koenig: Please send new proposals to the mailing list ... [18:02] Dieter Koenig: No call in August - next call September 4 [18:02] Dieter Koenig: Meeting adjourned
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]