OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [sca-bpel] Getting ready for PRD


Anish,

I'd be happy with not requiring 2/3 to open an issue, but I think we should still keep the 2/3 for re-opening a closed or deferred
issue, which will include pre-PR comments.

Martin.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: 02 March 2009 19:57
> To: Danny van der Rijn
> Cc: OASIS BPEL
> Subject: Re: [sca-bpel] Getting ready for PRD
> 
> Danny van der Rijn wrote:
> >
> >
> > Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> >>
> >> Few things we need to agree on for PRD:
> >>
> >> 2) Duration of the public review: OASIS process requires the 1st PR to
> >> be minimum of 60 days. I would like to suggest that we stick with the
> >> minimum.
> >>
> >
> > +1.  (60, not 61 ^_^)
> >>
> >>
> >> 4) How to deal with issues raised during the PR period either by TC
> >> members or non-TC members?
> >> Per the process, the TC must acknowledge the receipt of each comment,
> >> track the comments received, and publish to its primary e-mail list the
> >> disposition of each comment at the end of the review period.
> >>
> >> I would like to suggest that we follow SCA Policy TC's lead. Which is to
> >>   create a new component/subcomponent in JIRA for PR comments. All new
> >> issues raised, after we agree on the PRD, either by non-members or
> >> members (on the TC list or the PR feedback list) be logged as new issues
> >> in the new component/subcomponent.
> >>
> >
> > With what bar for opening the issue?  Still 2/3?
> >
> 
> We had discussed this when we created the 2/3rd majority standing rule
> and the general sense of the TC was that the 2/3rd majority rule ends
> with PR. The rationale for that was: PR allows a non-member to send any
> comment they want. It would not make sense to have a higher bar for
> members. So no 2/3rd rule once we go PR, is what I'm proposing. But we
> should discuss this during the call reaffirm this (or not).
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]