[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 35: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021
This is now issue 35 http://osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-35 Patil, Sanjay wrote: > > Title: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021 > > Target: SCA BPEL spec > > Description: > The RFC 2119 guideline for using the word 'MAY' is: > This word, or the adjective "OPTIONAL", mean that an item is > truly optional. One vendor may choose to include the item because a > particular marketplace requires it or because the vendor feels that > it enhances the product while another vendor may omit the same item. > SBPEL3021 reads as: An SCA extension attribute sca-bpel:requires MAY be > used to declare required policy intents on a partner link. > > The word 'MAY' in this statement is intended to point out a feature that > is available for users of the products implementing the specification > and is not intended to point out the optionality from a vendor > implementation point of view. > > Proposal: > Change SBPEL3021 to read as: > An SCA extension attribute sca-bpel:requires is used to declare required > policy intents on a partner link. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]