[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 58: propsal
Attached is a proposal for issue 58 per my AI [1]. The AI indicated rewriting section 2.1.1 to remove nested ifs. I did not do that for the reason that to do such a rewrite would require rewriting not just section 2.1.1 but lot of other sections as well. My model for doing it the "Right Way" is Java POJO spec section 8 [2]. That spec spells out the values of all the introspected component type attributes and elements in one place. Currently in our spec, we have the CT info distributed beyond section 2.1.1. For example in section 3. Before I embark on refactoring the spec, I want to gauge what the TC wishes to do. If we don't want to refactor the spec beyond section 2.1.1, the attached proposal should suffice. Thanks. -Anish -- [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=2877 [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/36013/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-cd01-rev4.pdf
sca-bpel-1.1-spec-cd02-rev7-issue58.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]