sca-bpel message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Raw Text for TC meeting of 15th April
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS BPEL" <sca-bpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:08:20 +0100
anish: Agenda -
anish: 1. Roll Call
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/members/roster.php
2. Appointment of scribe
Scribe list attached below
3. Agenda bashing
4. Approval of minutes
2010-04-01 minutes http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00005.html
5. Testing
a> Proposed changes for TA
i> SBL-TA-2009: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00024.html
ii> SBL-TA-2010: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00026.html
b> Status of SCA BPEL Runtime used
for testing
i> Support for multiReference extension:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00018.html
ii> Reference generation - http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00019.html
iii> Support for wiredByImpl - http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00025.html
c> Review of tests for
SBL-TA-2002: Test_SBPEL_2002
SBL-TA-2003: Test_SBPEL_2003
SBL-TA-2008: Test_SBPEL_2006
SBL-TA-2009: Test_SBPEL_2008, Test_SBPEL_2009
SBL-TA-2012: Test_SBPEL_2010
d> How to automate negative tests?
Should they be moved outside of SBPEL-General folder?
e> Input for writing tests for: SBL-TA-2005,
SBL-TA-2007, SBL-TA-2011 and SBL-TA-2011.1
e> Planned schedule -
Mar 18 - Revised specification draft
Mar 18 - Update Test Assertion Document
Apr 18 - Test Case Creation
Apr 29 - Review and finalization of
Test Cases
May 6 - Go for 2nd PR
Here is a rough break up of work for
creating the test cases. More volunteers are appreciated.
Sanjay - SBL-TA-1001 to SBL-TA-2018
Anish - SBL-TA-3001 to SBL-TA-3026
Discussion on how to run the tests:
Instruction for setting up Tuscany for
test case development and testing
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201002/msg00034.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201002/msg00036.html
6. AOB
anish: Agenda: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00044.html
anonymous morphed into Sanjay
anish: Chair: Sanjay Patil
anish: Scribe: Mike Edwards
Mike Edwards: Scribe: Mike Edwards
anish: ScribeNick: Mike Edwards
Mike Edwards: Item 3 Agenda Bashing
Mike Edwards: No changes
Mike Edwards: Item 4 Approval of Minutes
Mike Edwards: Minutes of 1st April:
Mike Edwards: 2010-04-01 minutes http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00005.html
Mike Edwards: Minutes are accepted without
change
Mike Edwards: Item 5 Testing
Mike Edwards: a) Changes to Test Assertions
Mike Edwards: 1) SBL-TA-2009
Mike Edwards: SCA_BPEL_Test_Assertions_16.odt
Mike Edwards: compare the TA with the
BPEL specification:
Mike Edwards: sca-bpel-1.1-spec-cd02-rev9.doc
Mike Edwards: Proposed changed TA:
Mike Edwards: (prerequesites =)
Mike Edwards: The partnerLink in the
BPEL process:
a) does not map
to a SCA service
b) does not have
a sca-bpel:ignore attribute
c) does not have
the @sca-bpel:multiRefFrom attribute, and
d) has @initializePartnerRole
attribute with a value of no
Mike Edwards: Dieter: does b) have to
be sca-bpel:ignore="false"
Mike Edwards: Anish: b) does not have
a sca-bpel:ignore="true" attribute
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: Yes
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: The proposed change
makes the TA agree with the latest form of the spec
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: So the proposal
is now
Mike Edwards: The partnerLink in the
BPEL process:
a) does not map
to a SCA service
b) does not have a sca-bpel:ignore="true"
attribute
c) does not have
the @sca-bpel:multiRefFrom attribute, and
d) has @initializePartnerRole
attribute with a value of no
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: So how are we
handling the changes to the TA document?
Mike Edwards: Martin: It isn't a formal
accepted document, so editors can just make changes
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: OK, so let's do
that
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: SBL-TA-2010:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00026.html
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: Need to make an
update to b) as for SBL-TA-2009
Mike Edwards: The partnerLink in the
BPEL process:
a) does not map
to a service
b) does not have
a sca-bpel:ignore="true" attribute
c) does not have
the @sca-bpel:multiRefFrom attribute, and
d) does not
have the @initializePartnerRole attribute
Mike Edwards: (for the prerequisite
of this TA)
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: No objections
to this proposed change
anish i have to step away for 5 minutes.
brb
Mike Edwards: Item 5b Status of SCA
BPEL Runtime used for testing
Mike Edwards: Support for multiReference
extension: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00018.html
Mike Edwards: Mike: This function is
not yet implemented in Tuscany as the spec was changing - I will update
the runtime to provide the function
Mike Edwards: ii> Reference generation
- http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00019.html
Mike Edwards: Sanjay:0..1 introspection
does not work correctly
Mike Edwards: Mike: Yes, I'll have to
implement it - we invented a new function to allow for checking of the
wired status of a 0..1 reference
Mike Edwards: iii> Support for wiredByImpl
- http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201004/msg00025.html
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: Is "wiredByImpl"
supported in the runtime?
Mike Edwards: Mike: No, it's not implemented
in the Tuscany BPEL runtime
Mike Edwards: Mike: Is it mandatory?
Mike Edwards: Anish: Depends on which
conformance level you claim
Mike Edwards: Mike: I am not sure that
there is any standard way of providing an EPR value to allow a wiredByImpl
partnerLink to be initialized
Mike Edwards: - thus no standard testcase
can be written
Dieter Koenig: This is a handshake between
the SCA runtime (providing the EPR value) and the BPEL runtime (consuming
the EPR value) - both must fit together
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: We could do a
negative testcase for this - check that an exception is thrown if a wiredByImpl
ref is wired
Mike Edwards: Sanjay: I'd like to rearrange
the order of the items on the agenda
Mike Edwards: Item d) d> How to automate
negative tests? Should they be moved outside of SBPEL-General folder?
Mike Edwards: Mike: You put all the
artifacts for a negative test into a separate contribution - like SPEL_3001
anish time check
Mike Edwards: AOB
Mike Edwards: COB
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]