ISSUE 85: Proposed response

[Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>]

I propose that we respond to this comment
with the following  (this would part of a e-mail that is a response
to all of his comments):

The SCA C & C++ TC recommends reading
and understanding the Assembly specification before trying to read and
understand the C++ client and implementation specification.  The Assembly
specification defines the core concepts, architecture and constructs for
SCA.  There are some additional concepts defined in the Policy Framework
that are also needed to understand parts of the C++ client and implementation
specification.  The C++ client and implementation specification defines
how the concepts, architecture and constructs  of the Assembly specification
and Policy Framework are to be implemented by a SCA runtime that supports
C++ component implementations and how C++ component implementations use
the concepts, architecture and constructs.

A discussion of the architectural choices
for SCA as a whole would need to be done by the Assembly TC as these choices
are intentionally implementation technology/language independent.  If
there are architectural choices specific to the to the implementation of
SCA in either C++ or C that you believe would benefit from further discussion,
the SCA C & C++ TC would welcome that input.

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

Research Triangle Park,  NC 
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com