Hi Bryan,
No, they're not - a second review requires redline or a detailed change log so that's what the cover page links point to. Of course the easiest thing to do is to view the source as Final no markup.
Mary
Mary P McRae Director, Standards Development Technical Committee Administrator OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen phone: 1.603.232.9090
Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
On Mar 2, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Bryan Aupperle wrote:
This is from the current SCA C and SCA
C++ public reviews. Point 1 asks for clean versions of the current
public review drafts. Are such versions available in the OASIS document
repository?
Thanks.
Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Research Triangle Park, NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Bryan
Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM on 03/02/2010 08:19 AM -----
This is Microsoft’s public comment about
the following two specifications under public review per announcement [1]:
- Service
Component Architecture Client and Implementation Model for C++ Specification
Version 1.1
- Service
Component Architecture Client and Implementation Model for C Specification
Version 1.1
We have been attempting to review the above
specifications, but have been unable to complete our review due the following
problems with the specifications as published:
1) The revised C and C++ specifications
http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-c-cpp/sca-ccni-1.1-spec-cd04.pdf
and http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-c-cpp/sca-cppcni-1.1-spec-cd04.html
include markup to indicate changes but we could not find where the clean
versions are provided. There is enough markup in these documents to make
the document impossible to review in places.
2) The RDDL document for http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200912
refers to at least two XML Schema documents that are not valid. For
example the first XML schema listed (http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-1.1-cd05.xsd)
apparently contains invalid whitespace, and the 5th item (http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-policy-1.1-intents-definitions-cd03.xsd)returns
“HTTP 404 Not Found” error.
3) The RDDL document for http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200912
refers to at least one XML Schema document that returns a 404. For example
the 5th XML Schema listed (http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-policy-1.1-intents-definitions-cd03.xsd)
is not retrievable (404 error).
4) But the biggest obstacle in our reviewing
of the specifications is the fact that the required C/C++ header files
are missing from the specifications. Without being able to review the C/C++
header files, it is impossible to perform a complete and meaningful review
of the specifications.
Sincerely,
Michael Champion,
Microsoft Corporation
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201002/msg00005.html
|