[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 51: More examples on <interface.wsdl> mapping toJava
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-51 Savchenko, Vladimir wrote: > TARGET: Java Common Annotations and APIs, WD 03 > DESCRIPTION: > The current specification is missing a detailed description of how > <interface.wsdl> is mapped to a Java class. > IMO SCA-J and SCA-Bindigs specs have focused on the so called > “Inside-Out”-case. E.g. start with the Java Implementation, and then > expose it as web service. Most of the issues relate to this process, and > most of the examples are – “component with service with interface.java, > promoted to service on composite level with interface.wsdl”. > > If I am mistaken – then I appologise myslef… > > But – it seems that a more common scenario is when one starts with WSDL. > This would mean that “interface.java” does not need to be mentioned at > all. And we will have components with a Service element with > ‘interface.wsdl’. > The SCA-J tells for this – just follow JAX-WS. But there are no examples. > And there are really intetresting cases. e.g. > -> Use JAX-WS and JAXB for data binding > -> Use JAX-WS and SDO for data binding > > Use Static SDO > > Use dynamic SDO > -> How to handle the WS Annotations coming from JSR 181, and how are > they related to the ones defined in SCA-J ? > > I am not telling that the current spec does not address this topic. Just > that it may be enriched with more examples and made more formal, so that > we can reach some state of interoperability on this topi at some point > of time. > > PROPOSAL: > No proposal yet. I have some ideas, but I would like to collect more > feedback, and then create a common proposal for this. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]