Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 3 - revised proposal for resolution

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

A couple of comments as <mje>...</mje>

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
To:	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	28/10/2008 19:31
Subject:	Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 3 - revised proposal for resolution

---

Hi Simon,

It's been a long time since we talked about this, so we might have answered
this before:

1) Are bindings allowed on services which have been derived from @Local
services? Assembly spec [1] doesn't say. Perhaps this is an issue for Assembly.
<mje>
In my opinion, whether
Bindings are allowed on services / references which are typed with Local
interfaces is an issue for
the Assembly specification.
 I will raise an issue for this.

In my opinion, Local services
and references should not be allowed to have Bindings.
</mje>

2) An observation; Assembly spec [1] lines 2425-2426 will be affected by
this resolution.
<mje>
In my opinion, those lines
have no business being in the Assembly specification.
I will raise an issue to
remove them.
</mje>

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/29678/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2.pdf

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

Simon
Nash ---10/24/2008 03:59:39 PM---The following proposed resolution is a
modification of the proposal submitted by Mike Rowley in

From:	Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>
To:	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	10/24/2008 03:59 PM
Subject:	[sca-j] ISSUE 3 - revised proposal for resolution

---

The following proposed resolution is a modification of the proposal
submitted by Mike Rowley in
 http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/email/archives/200710/msg00059.html

Proposal:

Introduce a new interface annotation called @Local.  If a component
implementation
implements an interface that has been marked as @Local, the component type
will
include a service whose type is that (non-remotable) interface.  In
this way, the
@Local annotation is similar to the @Remotable annotation, but without
implying
remote-call semantics.

The rules for generating services for a class that does not include the
@Service
annotation are the following:

1) If the class implements interfaces, generate services for each implemented
   interface that has been marked as either @Remotable or @Local,
where the
   type of the service is that interface.  Any implemented interfaces
that have
   not been marked as either @Remotable or @Local do not have services
generated
   for them.

2) If the class implements no interfaces, it offers a single service whose
type
   is that class.

  Simon



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU