OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
108 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: Appeal of the OASIS decision on SCA-J package names
From
Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org> on 1 Jan 2009 01:15:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 and ISSUE 95
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 19 Dec 2008 17:23:41 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 and ISSUE 95
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 19 Dec 2008 14:28:36 -0000
Re: [sca-j] new documents to review
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 19 Dec 2008 05:58:27 -0000
ISSUE-118: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/>
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 18 Dec 2008 21:36:34 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/>
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 18 Dec 2008 19:08:57 -0000
Re: [sca-j] new documents to review
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 18 Dec 2008 16:28:52 -0000
Next Telecon - Fri Dec 19 - CANCELLED
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 18 Dec 2008 14:44:31 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon cancelled
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 18 Dec 2008 14:36:55 -0000
ISSUE 25 and ISSUE 95
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 18 Dec 2008 08:12:26 -0000
Re: [sca-j] new documents to review
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 17 Dec 2008 08:11:40 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Proposal for removing per-call correlation
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Dec 2008 21:19:21 -0000
new documents to review
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Dec 2008 20:30:50 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA cd01 rev3 (pdf) (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev3.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 16 Dec 2008 20:22:54 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA cd01 rev3 (doc) (sca-javacaa-1[1].1-spec-cd01-rev3.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 16 Dec 2008 20:12:27 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA cd01 rev3 (pdf) (sca-javacaa-1[1].1-spec-cd01-rev3.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 16 Dec 2008 20:11:33 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD02 (DOC) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd02.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 16 Dec 2008 20:10:20 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD02 (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd02.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 16 Dec 2008 20:09:23 -0000
Resolution of Assembly Issue 33 - potential impact on your TC
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Dec 2008 09:08:58 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-117: Clarify the name implied by setter methodfor property and reference names
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Dec 2008 21:18:06 -0000
Re: An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org> on 15 Dec 2008 20:23:32 -0000
Raw Chat from Dec 15 Telcon
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 15 Dec 2008 17:02:24 -0000
[ISSUE 55] Final Agreed Resolution Text
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 15 Dec 2008 16:29:49 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 111: Proposed resolution - take 3
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Dec 2008 15:31:19 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 15 Dec 2008 15:04:32 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 111: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Dec 2008 14:36:11 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 111: Proposed resolution
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 15 Dec 2008 13:53:35 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 15 Dec 2008 13:40:18 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Issues 111 and 55
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 15 Dec 2008 11:18:15 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 15 Dec 2008 11:10:02 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 95: Proposed direction for resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Dec 2008 10:52:39 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-12 (SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-12.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 15 Dec 2008 10:30:12 -0000
Issues 111 and 55
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Dec 2008 10:29:58 -0000
ISSUE 111: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Dec 2008 10:22:19 -0000
All CAA issue resolutions to date applied in cd01-rev2
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 13 Dec 2008 01:18:05 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2.pdf uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 13 Dec 2008 01:08:32 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2.doc uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 13 Dec 2008 01:08:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Clarify the name implied by setter method for property and reference names
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 12 Dec 2008 22:56:50 -0000
Resolution of issue 75
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 12 Dec 2008 22:44:21 -0000
ISSUE-117: Clarify the name implied by setter method for property andreference names
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 21:23:19 -0000
ISSUE-116: Is dependency injection for HttpSessionBindingListener possible?
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 21:23:18 -0000
Re: An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 20:31:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Dec 2008 14:56:20 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 12 Dec 2008 14:10:44 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Clarify the name implied by setter method for property andreference names
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 14:00:01 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Clarify the name implied by setter method for property andreference names
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 13:52:55 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - Updated Proposal
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 13:48:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 13:00:52 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - Updated Proposal
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 11:31:49 -0000
[ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 10:28:36 -0000
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 09:44:49 -0000
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 09:08:42 -0000
Re: [sca-j] List of issues against Java CAA that are resolved bynot applied
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 12 Dec 2008 07:54:17 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev1.pdf uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 12 Dec 2008 07:45:29 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev1.doc uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 12 Dec 2008 07:44:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 96: Proposal - "Are annotations allowed on static methods?"
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 12 Dec 2008 07:05:34 -0000
List of issues against Java CAA that are resolved by not applied
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 12 Dec 2008 05:21:35 -0000
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 11 Dec 2008 23:52:33 -0000
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 11 Dec 2008 23:17:14 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 96: Proposal - "Are annotations allowed on static methods?"
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 11 Dec 2008 17:26:54 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 96: Proposal - "Are annotations allowed on static methods?"
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 11 Dec 2008 13:19:34 -0000
ISSUE 96: Proposal - "Are annotations allowed on static methods?"
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 11 Dec 2008 12:01:42 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 11 Dec 2008 11:17:10 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-05 (SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-05.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 11 Dec 2008 11:12:31 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-08 (SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-08.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 11 Dec 2008 10:14:02 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 10 Dec 2008 15:01:34 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly-testing] Re: [sca-j] testing architecture
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 10 Dec 2008 08:05:16 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2008 22:03:35 -0000
ISSUE-115: Runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 22:01:44 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 95: Proposed direction for resolution
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 21:32:39 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2008 19:33:22 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon cancelled
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2008 19:22:02 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon cancelled
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2008 19:21:38 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon added
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2008 19:19:29 -0000
ISSUE-114: Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 19:03:31 -0000
ISSUE-113: JEE integration behaviour when annotation rules are violated
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 19:01:31 -0000
ISSUE 112: Spurious cast() method definition in ComponentContext interface
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 19:01:29 -0000
Today's raw chat log
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 17:40:27 -0000
raw chat room
From
"Pavlov, Plamen" <plamen.pavlov@sap.com> on 8 Dec 2008 16:56:28 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation rules areviolated
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Dec 2008 16:21:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 15:29:28 -0000
NEW ISSUE: JEE integration behaviour when annotation rules are violated
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Dec 2008 15:29:11 -0000
Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Dec 2008 15:26:19 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Dec 2008 15:23:33 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2008 15:17:25 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Spurious cast() method definition in ComponentContextinterface
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Dec 2008 15:10:40 -0000
ISSUE 95: Proposed direction for resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Dec 2008 15:03:11 -0000
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 13:23:21 -0000
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 13:15:44 -0000
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 13:15:44 -0000
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Dec 2008 13:13:06 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 8 Dec 2008 10:15:51 -0000
ISSUE 25: Proposal for removing per-call correlation
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 7 Dec 2008 22:28:44 -0000
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 6 Dec 2008 21:25:59 -0000
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 6 Dec 2008 11:45:18 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 5 Dec 2008 21:13:40 -0000
ISSUE-111: @Constructor value attribute should not be optional
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 5 Dec 2008 20:43:03 -0000
URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 5 Dec 2008 20:38:43 -0000
An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names
From
Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org> on 5 Dec 2008 18:55:00 -0000
NEW ISSUE: @Constructor value attribute should not be optional
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 5 Dec 2008 16:26:32 -0000
[Fwd: RE: Request to upload SCA-J TC Java Common Annotations andAPI CD 01 spec]
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 5 Dec 2008 15:22:15 -0000
ISSUE 30 - Process scoped components
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 2 Dec 2008 18:59:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Next Telecon
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Dec 2008 15:14:33 -0000
URGENT - SCA-J TC Telecon scheduled for Friday Dec 5
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 1 Dec 2008 19:21:20 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon added
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 1 Dec 2008 19:14:58 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Next Telecon
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 1 Dec 2008 13:25:36 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 1 Dec 2008 10:10:21 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Next Telecon
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 1 Dec 2008 07:08:57 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2