sca-j message

Subject: ISSUE 56 application, was Re: [sca-j] new documents to review

From: David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:29:42 -0500

ok, I think I understand what you are saying now. The text should probably read:

A component MUST NOT have two services with the same Java simple name. If a Java implementation needs to realize two services with the same interface then this can be achieved through subclassing of the interface.

However, since the resolution was explicit in the F2F minutes, the TC will have to make a decision to change it.

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

C Vamsi ---12/19/2008 12:58:21 AM---comments inline inside <vamsi> tags. ++Vamsi

From:	C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com>
To:	David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	12/19/2008 12:58 AM
Subject:	Re: [sca-j] new documents to review

comments inline inside <vamsi> tags. ++Vamsi Apache Tuscany Committer http://tuscany.apache.orgApache Geronimo Committer and Member of PMC http://geronimo.apache.org David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> To 18/12/2008 21:46 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org cc Subject Re: [sca-j] new documents to review Thanks for the quick review. See below. As a result of these comments, I have started a rev4 containing these changes. If there are other review comments which are editorial, I'll incorporate them also and publish rev4 some time before our next call in Jan. Dave Booz STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com (Embedded image moved to file: pic25675.jpg)C Vamsi ---12/17/2008 03:11:53 AM---A few comments on CAA spec are given below: 0. There is "[1]" is the doc file name. Can we get rid (Embedde (Embedded image moved to file: pic19524.jpg) d image C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> moved to file: pic08318 .jpg) From: (Embedde (Embedded image moved to file: pic23167.jpg) d image David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS moved to file: pic03285 .jpg) To: (Embedde (Embedded image moved to file: pic03710.jpg) d image sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org moved to file: pic26392 .jpg) Cc: (Embedde (Embedded image moved to file: pic01568.jpg) d image 12/17/2008 03:11 AM moved to file: pic09213 .jpg) Date: (Embedde (Embedded image moved to file: pic10425.jpg) d image Re: [sca-j] new documents to review moved to file: pic31446 .jpg) Subject: A few comments on CAA spec are given below: 0. There is "[1]" is the doc file name. Can we get rid of that? <dab> That convention seems to have been started during creation of CD01 and I didn't want to deviate. All of the revs are like that. </dab> <vamsi>I think the extra "[1]" in the file name is a download accelerator (like DAP??) thing that puts these characters in the filename if a file with the same name already exists. So, there shouldn't be any problem in not following that "convention" :o) </vamsi> 1. In page 1, under This Version, it says rev2 instead of rev3. <dab> Good catch. No idea how I missed it will all the other editorial stuff. </dab> 2. In section 7.1, the method descriptions for ComponentContext methods seem to appear in the same order as the methods in the interface definition except for the cast() method. Change the interface definition so that getRequestContext() in line 665 appears before cast() at line 662. <dab> This is editorial, so I made the change. </dab> 3. Now that we say that the default name for @Property and @Reference annotation on a setter method is the JavaBeans property name, should we add a reference to JavaBeans spec? <dab> Good idea. This is editorial, so I did it. </dab> 4. The text in lines 1704 thru 1706 is: "A component MUST NOT have two services with the same Java simple name. If a Java implementation needs to realize two services with the same Java simple name then this can be achieved through subclassing of the interface." I do not understand the second sentence in this. Does it mean there will be two services with the same name?? Can someone please explain? Also, the text that is deleted seem to talk about realizing two services with the same interface. Whereas the new text is talking about two services with same Java simple name. The text is from resolution of ISSUE-56 resolved at F2F in Nov. I apologize for the late turn around on this. <dab> No, there will not be two services with the same name. The sub- classed simple name would have to be different from the parent simple name. The reason for the subclassing is that both services provide the same operations. We clarified the terminology from interface to simple name because interface name could be taken to mean the simple name plus the package name. </dab> <vamsi> The text, "... realize two services with the same Java simple name then ..." does not seem to mean the subclassed simple name should be different from the parent simple name!! </vamsi> ++Vamsi Apache Tuscany Committer http://tuscany.apache.orgApache Geronimo Committer and Member of PMC http://geronimo.apache.org David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> To 17/12/2008 01:58 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org cc Subject [sca-j] new documents to review There is now a Java CAA rev3 [1],[2] with 56,75, and 111 applied. Anish, there were a few editorial problems with your changes in rev2 that I fixed up, but I did not do a thorough review of your changes. [1]http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/30417/sca-javacaa-1%5B1%5D.1-spec-cd01-rev3.doc[2]http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/30419/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev3.pdfThis is also a working draft 02 for the Java C&I spec [3],[4] (I started with 2 because there was a previous draft, if you don't like it I don't care) with issues 32 and 55 applied as well as a bunch of editorial stuff to get it in line with namespaces, document conventions, etc. Since there is no CD01 for this document, I guessed that I was supposed to make this a WD instead of a rev. [3]http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/30416/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd02.doc[4]http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/30415/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd02.pdfDave Booz STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php(See attached file: pic25675.jpg)(See attached file: pic08318.jpg)(See attached file: pic19524.jpg)(See attached file: pic03285.jpg)(See attached file: pic23167.jpg)(See attached file: pic26392.jpg)(See attached file: pic03710.jpg)(See attached file: pic09213.jpg)(See attached file: pic01568.jpg)(See attached file: pic31446.jpg)(See attached file: pic10425.jpg)