Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components- Updated proposal revision 2

[Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>]

Mark,
My comments are in the attached document.

   Simon

Mark Combellack wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> As discussed in our conference calls, I have updated the proposal for 
> JAVA-65 to remove the PostInit and PreDestroy phases to simplify the 
> model. The attached document contains the revised proposal
> 
>  
> 
> All changes for Issue 65 are contained in a new chapter 4.
> 
>  
> 
> The changes between this new revision 2 and the original proposal are:
> 
>  
> 
>     * Removed the @PostInit annotation and associated state in the
>       lifecycle model
>     * Removed the @PreDestroy annotation and associated state in the
>       lifecycle model
> 
>  
> 
> This update completes my action 2009-02-19-02.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Mark
> 
> Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park | St. 
> Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | 
> mcombellack@avaya.com <mailto:|mcombellack@avaya.com>
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2_plus_Issue 65-rev2-simon.doc