sca-j message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [ISSUE 148] Java CAA missing full definition of annotations applying toJava Interfaces - Updated Proposal
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:51:28 +0100
Folks,
Following yesterday's discussion of
Issue 148, here is an updated proposal that goes along the lines suggested
by
Anish - ie 3 normative statements which
outlaw the use of specific annotations for interfaces and for implementation
classes.
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/31973/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_Issue148_2.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/31972/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_Issue148_2.doc
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]