Re: [sca-j] Latest Java CAA Draft - with 8.6.2 removed

[Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>]

I have reviewed this document and made some minor editorial changes
inline as tracked changes to create rev8a, which I have posted here:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/32360/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev8a.doc
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/32361/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev8a.pdf

The changes I made are as follows:

section 1: corrected inconsistency introduced by wd08 changes
section 2.3: fixed typo "implemementation"
section 2.3.1: corrected formatting error in hyperlink text
section 2.3.1: fixed capitalization in hyperlink text
section 2.3.1: corrected target of hyperlink
section 3.1: fixed missing space between words
section 6: corrected text of hyperlink
section 7.1: corrected text of hyperlink
section 7.2.1: fixed smart quotes in code
section 8: corrected target of hyperlink
section 8.5: fixed smart quotes in code
section 8.1: fixed smart quotes in code
section 8.2.1: fixed smart quotes in string literal
section 8.5: put EBNF in non-code font
section 8.6.1: fixed smart quotes in string literals
section 9.1: fixed smart quotes in code
section 9.2: corrected text of hyperlink
section 10.15: deleted stray "However" left over from wd08 edit and
                capitalized the first letter of JCA90011
section 10.17: changed 200712 to 200903 in namespace (twice)
section 10.17: fixed smart quotes in code
section 12.1: added "SCA" before second occurrence of "ComponentType
               Document" for consistency with other references in the
               same paragraph
JCA90008: fixed typo "@Initi"
JCA90021: changed double blank to single blank
JCA90047: fixed "the the"

Other changes:
I updated the title page to say Rev 08a
I updated the revision history
I changed the font size in Appendix B to 9-point because the previous
   8-point size was causing all conformance statements to show up in the
   main text in the PDF file in a smaller font than the surrounding text
I rebuilt the TOC (needed to get the correct section titles in TOC)

Non-editorial comments for which I will raise new issues to be
treated as public review comments:
1. section 10.4: need a normative statement saying that the
    field or setter method MUST be of type String.
2. section 10.12: Need to say what happens if both the value and
    targetNamespace/localPart attributes are specified.  Does one
    take priority over the other, or is this illegal?
3. section 10.21: "interfaces" multiplicity is listed as 1..1
    (should be 0..1) and "value" multiplicity is not stated.
    I will raise an issue suggesting that these don't need to be
    separate attributes and should be merged.

   Simon

Mike Edwards wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Here is the latest draft:
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/32355/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev8.pdf 
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/32354/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev8.doc 
> 
> 
> Yours,  Mike.
> 
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
> Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> /
> /
> 
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>