[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] Specifications for Public Review
Dave, These annotations and APIs are not only for the "POJO" implementation type. They are also for Spring, EJB, JEE, etc. So I don't think we should call them POJO annotations. How about using the term "SCA-J" instead of "POJO"? This gives the following name for the CAA spec: Service Component Architecture SCA-J Common Annotations and APIs Specification Version 1.1 We could consider also using this term for the CI spec, which would then be called: Service Component Architecture SCA-J Component Implementation Specification Version 1.1 For the CI spec, I am more open to using POJO as it is technically accurate and readily understood. Simon David Booz wrote: > I feel like we need to get something Java-like into the title of the CAA > spec. Here's some possible variants: > > (a) Service Component Architecture Common Annotations and APIs for POJOs > Specification > > (b) Service Component Architecture POJO Common Annotations and APIs > Specification > > (c) Service Component Architecture Common POJO Annotations and APIs > Specification > > > Dave Booz > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com > > Inactive hide details for Mike Edwards ---05/29/2009 03:30:03 > AM---Folks, I'm OK with Anish's suggestions, given that we can't Mike > Edwards ---05/29/2009 03:30:03 AM---Folks, I'm OK with Anish's > suggestions, given that we can't use "Java" in the > > > From: > Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> > > To: > "OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org> > > Date: > 05/29/2009 03:30 AM > > Subject: > Re: [sca-j] Specifications for Public Review > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > Folks, > > I'm OK with Anish's suggestions, given that we can't use "Java" in the > title of either specification. > > Yours, Mike. > > Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO. > Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC. > IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain. > Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 > Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com > > From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> > To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>, David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> > Date: 29/05/2009 06:23 > Subject: Re: [sca-j] Specifications for Public Review > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > How about 'I-can't-believe-its-not-Java'? > > But seriously, I'm not sure replacing Java with J makes a meaningful > title. The JCI spec would then be titled: > Service Component Architecture J Component Implementation Specification > Version 1.1 > > A better name perhaps is: > Service Component Architecture POJO Component Implementation > Specification Version 1.1 > > For the JCAA spec, I suppose we could just drop the 'Java' and have it be: > Service Component Architecture Common Annotations and APIs Specification > Version 1.1 > > Comments? > > -Anish > -- > > Mary McRae wrote: > > I was just about to send these out and noticed that the Specification > > titles use the word "Java" - this is prohibited by the OASIS TC Process > > Policy, in the same way that it was prohibited from being used in the > > name of the TC. > > > > From section 2.18 Specification Quality: > > "All documents and other files produced by the TC, including > > specifications at any level of approval, must use the OASIS file naming > > scheme, and must include the OASIS copyright notice. All document files > > must be written using the OASIS document authoring templates, which > > shall be published and maintained by the TC Administrator. The name of > > any specification may not include any trademarks or service marks not > > owned by OASIS." > > > > I can simply edit the files and replace "Java" with "J" or you can > > provide updated files; whichever you prefer. > > > > Regards, > > > > Mary > > > > Mary P McRae > > Director, Standards Development > > Technical Committee Administrator > > OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society > > email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > > web: _www.oasis-open.org_ > > twitter: fiberartisan #oasisopen > > phone: 1.603.232.9090 > > > > Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > > _https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php_ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:_ > __https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php_ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > / > / > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/ > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]