Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and<operationSelection/> - proposal v3

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

If we agree to go this route, the EJB binding spec might look different than the current proposal. I would throw away the current proposal and simply add a new section before the Appendix, like this:

7 Wire Format and Operation Selectors

The SCA Assembly Model Specification [ASSEMBLY] defines extensibility points for bindings to specify <wireFormat/> and <operationSelector/> configuration. This specification does not define any wire format or operation selector extension elements.


Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

Mike Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:09 AM---Folks, I wonder why we need a description of these 2 elements in this binding,

From:	Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
To:	"OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	06/11/2009 02:53 AM
Subject:	Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v2

---

Folks, 

I wonder why we need a description of these 2 elements in this binding, given that it does not actually support them. 

I note that the issue has been raised in Assembly to make the elements abstract, so that in reality only specific extended 
forms of these elements can be used anywhere - and this spec states that it does not support any of them. 


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
To:	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	10/06/2009 15:22
Subject:	[sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v2

---

There was a small editorial change to this proposal noted in the telecon. I am reposting v2 of the proposal just for that change. I believe we are blocked on this issue until Anish raises the binding issue to address wireFormat and OperationSelector in the pseudo schema of the WS binding spec.

(See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc)

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com[attachment "sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU