OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
121 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
[sca-j] Java TC July 20th minutes(raw)
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 31 Jul 2009 15:18:03 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Considering cancelling SCA-J call today (Friday 31st July)?
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 31 Jul 2009 13:14:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Considering cancelling SCA-J call today (Friday 31st July)?
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 31 Jul 2009 12:54:10 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Considering cancelling SCA-J call today (Friday 31stJuly)?
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 31 Jul 2009 10:37:47 -0000
Considering cancelling SCA-J call today (Friday 31st July)?
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 31 Jul 2009 10:08:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Apologies for this Friday's meeting
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 31 Jul 2009 09:43:44 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 31 Jul 2009 07:45:59 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 30 Jul 2009 19:02:00 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-27 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-27.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 30 Jul 2009 18:57:35 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v3
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 30 Jul 2009 14:54:29 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Updated Proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 30 Jul 2009 12:44:20 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v3
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 30 Jul 2009 10:01:31 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 30 Jul 2009 09:24:39 -0000
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106v3.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 30 Jul 2009 09:23:24 -0000
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - PDF format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106v3.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 30 Jul 2009 09:22:46 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Apologies for this Friday's meeting
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 30 Jul 2009 05:43:42 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Updated Proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jul 2009 18:17:37 -0000
Apologies for this Friday's meeting
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Jul 2009 15:49:40 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Jul 2009 15:44:32 -0000
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - PDF format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106v2.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 29 Jul 2009 15:44:06 -0000
ISSUE 107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB Binding Specification -proposal v3
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jul 2009 15:43:58 -0000
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106v2.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 29 Jul 2009 15:42:55 -0000
Groups - SCA EJB Binding Issue 107 (RFC2119) pdf (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04+issue107_v3.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 29 Jul 2009 15:23:56 -0000
Groups - SCA EJB Binding Issue 107 (RFC2119) doc (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04+issue107_v3.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 29 Jul 2009 15:23:12 -0000
Updated Test Assertions Document for Java CAA
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Jul 2009 10:36:13 -0000
Groups - Java CAA Test Assertions - ODT Format (SCA_J_CAA_Test_Assertions_6.odt) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 28 Jul 2009 10:33:10 -0000
Groups - Java CAA Test Assertions - PDF Format (SCA_J_CAA_Test_Assertions_6.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 28 Jul 2009 10:32:23 -0000
Today's chat log
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 27 Jul 2009 15:53:59 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 27 Jul 2009 14:40:30 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 27 Jul 2009 14:39:44 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 27 Jul 2009 14:18:24 -0000
[ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&I Specification -Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Jul 2009 13:00:59 -0000
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - PDF format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Jul 2009 12:58:42 -0000
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 27 Jul 2009 12:56:04 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification should use "id" of the bean to uniquely identify a bean instead of its name [JAVA-175]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 27 Jul 2009 10:40:59 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v2 - REVIEW
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Jul 2009 09:22:10 -0000
NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification should use "id" of the bean touniquely identify a bean instead of its name
From
Ramkumar R1 <ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com> on 27 Jul 2009 07:23:54 -0000
[sca-j] [JAVA-150] SCA Spring C & I specification need to mention how SCAruntime should load multiple application context files.
From
Ramkumar R1 <ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com> on 27 Jul 2009 06:59:15 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 26 Jul 2009 18:38:33 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-24 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-24.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 26 Jul 2009 18:32:11 -0000
Raw Chat from Today's Call
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 24 Jul 2009 14:57:23 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 24 Jul 2009 13:29:31 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v2
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 24 Jul 2009 12:58:20 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 24 Jul 2009 12:19:09 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v1
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 24 Jul 2009 05:58:42 -0000
ISSUE-174: Consider portlets in the SCA JEE specification
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 23 Jul 2009 18:34:03 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Consider portlets in the SCA JEE specification
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 23 Jul 2009 18:30:37 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 23 Jul 2009 13:25:14 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-20 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-20.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 23 Jul 2009 12:47:27 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-17 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-17.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 23 Jul 2009 12:46:59 -0000
LOA request
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jul 2009 14:24:33 -0000
ISSUE-107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB Binding Specification -proposal v1
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jul 2009 14:23:37 -0000
Groups - EJB Binding Issue 107 proposal (doc) (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04+issue107_v1.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 22 Jul 2009 14:13:09 -0000
Groups - EJB Binding Issue 107 proposal (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04+issue107_v1.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 22 Jul 2009 14:12:22 -0000
LOA request
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jul 2009 13:25:58 -0000
ISSUE-173: SCA Spring C & I specification should mention how implicitservices should be determined for special bean definitions
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2009 13:05:18 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Java CAA spec - Incorrect use of RFC2119 keywords
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2009 13:02:27 -0000
ISSUE-172: Java CAA spec - Incorrect use of RFC2119 keywords
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2009 12:52:48 -0000
ISSUE-171: Duplicate normative statements in Java CI and Java CAA
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2009 12:52:48 -0000
NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification should mention how implicitservices should be determined for special bean definitions
From
Ramkumar R1 <ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2009 12:24:25 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Java CAA spec - Incorrect use of RFC2119 keywords
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 20 Jul 2009 23:57:09 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Java CAA spec - Incorrect use of RFC2119 keywords
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 20:05:32 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Duplicate normative statements in Java CI and Java CAA
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 20:05:32 -0000
[sca-j] Java TC July 20th minutes(raw)
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 16:18:47 -0000
ISSUE-170: Description of bindingType for EJB binding is missing from spec
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 15:48:17 -0000
ISSUE-169: EJB Binding spec needs a conformance section
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 14:31:35 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Description of bindingType for EJB binding is missing from spec
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 14:25:04 -0000
NEW ISSUE: EJB Binding spec needs a conformance section
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 14:19:05 -0000
EJB Binding WD 04 - latest issues applied
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 14:08:48 -0000
Groups - SCA EJB Binding WD 04 (doc) (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 20 Jul 2009 13:47:16 -0000
SCA Spring WD02
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2009 13:47:12 -0000
Groups - SCA Spring WD02 - PDF (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Jul 2009 13:44:51 -0000
Groups - SCA Spring WD02 - Word (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Jul 2009 13:44:16 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 19 Jul 2009 11:01:46 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [SCA-J] Current open issue status
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Jul 2009 21:11:36 -0000
Raw Text Meeting Minutes - TC meeting of 17th July 2009
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Jul 2009 15:22:04 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [SCA-J] Current open issue status
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Jul 2009 09:18:45 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 17 Jul 2009 09:13:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [SCA-J] Current open issue status
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Jul 2009 08:38:05 -0000
[ISSUE 59] SCA Spring C & I specification does not state what happens whena Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple interfaces - UPDATEDPROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Jul 2009 08:34:51 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: [sca-policy] A New SCA Testing TC?
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 17 Jul 2009 00:19:48 -0000
Re: [sca-policy] A New SCA Testing TC?
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 16 Jul 2009 23:42:39 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 16 Jul 2009 18:25:52 -0000
[SCA-J] Current open issue status
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 16 Jul 2009 18:24:39 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Review comments on Java CAA TA Document
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Jul 2009 14:59:24 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-13 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-13.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 16 Jul 2009 14:57:21 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Review comments on Java CAA TA Document
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Jul 2009 14:31:46 -0000
Review comments on Java CAA TA Document
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Jul 2009 13:14:31 -0000
RE: [sca-bindings] A New SCA Testing TC?
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 15 Jul 2009 21:11:20 -0000
A New SCA Testing TC?
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 15 Jul 2009 20:43:19 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Interesting PR comment
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 15 Jul 2009 19:14:09 -0000
Interesting PR comment
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 15 Jul 2009 19:08:10 -0000
Java TC raw minutes July 13th 2009
From
Graham Charters <CHARTERS@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Jul 2009 16:05:05 -0000
[ISSUE 58] SCA Spring C&I Specification does not have a normativedefinition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a Spring Applicationcontext - Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Jul 2009 09:41:09 -0000
Groups - Issue 58 Proposal - Word (sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58e.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jul 2009 09:37:16 -0000
Groups - Issue 58 Proposal - PDF (sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58e.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jul 2009 09:36:03 -0000
[ISSUE 164] Spring C&I SCA extension element does not provide fullfunctionality possible in an SCA CT - Resolution
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Jul 2009 09:21:16 -0000
Groups - Issue 164 Proposal - PDF format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01+Issue164b.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jul 2009 09:20:06 -0000
Groups - Issue 164 Proposal - Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01+Issue164b.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jul 2009 09:19:46 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 12 Jul 2009 21:32:07 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-10 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-10.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 12 Jul 2009 21:27:42 -0000
Raw minutes for 10 July
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 10 Jul 2009 14:51:26 -0000
Fw: PDF line number changes
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jul 2009 19:15:10 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 9 Jul 2009 14:35:21 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-06 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-06.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 7 Jul 2009 08:03:53 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code - Updated Proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 6 Jul 2009 13:23:15 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 6 Jul 2009 08:25:32 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 5 Jul 2009 21:45:21 -0000
JAVA-139: Update to proposed changes to JavaCAA
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 5 Jul 2009 21:41:38 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 5 Jul 2009 19:48:39 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-06-29 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-06-29.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 5 Jul 2009 19:20:59 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-168: Conversion rules for property values are notspecified
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Jul 2009 14:45:00 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Jul 2009 13:38:19 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-168: Conversion rules for property values are notspecified
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 2 Jul 2009 13:03:25 -0000
ISSUE-168: Conversion rules for property values are not specified
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 2 Jul 2009 12:28:22 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 2 Jul 2009 11:29:52 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Conversion rules for property values are not specified
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Jul 2009 10:24:40 -0000
Conversion rules for property values are not specified
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Jul 2009 10:23:18 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Jul 2009 10:15:34 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 1 Jul 2009 20:02:07 -0000
ISSUE-118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> -proposal v4
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 1 Jul 2009 19:22:52 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2