[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ISSUE 216: Resolution of Issue 201 is insufficient
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-216 Dave Booz STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |10/25/2010 10:15 AM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |[sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Resolution of Issue 201 is insufficient | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Target: CAA Sepc CD04-Rev2 Description: Issue 201 expanded the definition of @Remotable to have @Target(TYPE,FIELD,PARAMETER) - FIELD and PARAMETER were added. This is insufficient since JCA90053 states: The @Remotable annotation is valid only on a Java interface, a Java class, a field, a setter method, or a constructor parameter. It MUST NOT appear anywhere else. and The POJO specs states (lines 532-534 of CD02-rev2) remotable attribute of <interface.java> child element is omitted unless the interface class has no @Remotable annotation and there is a @Remotable annotation on the field, setter method or constructor parameter, in which case the <interface.java> element has remotable="true" and (lines 600-605 of CD02-rev2) An unannotated field or setter method is a reference if: · its type is an interface annotated with @Remotable · its type is an array where the element type of the array is an interface annotated with @Remotable · its type is a java.util.Collection where the parameterized type of the Collection or its member type is an interface annotated with @Remotable Proposal: change the @Target fro @Remotable to : @Target (TYPE,METHOD,FIELD,PARAMETER) Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D. STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect WW Center of Excellence for Enterprise Systems & Banking Center of Excellence Application Integration Architect Research Triangle Park, NC +1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508) Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]