[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] File names for our specs
Hi Anish, If you use a filename that reflects the approval stage of a work product, the proper abbreviation should be used. It would be appreciated, beyond that, if you follow the new requirements w/r/t removing 'spec' and adding the 'v' for the new filenames but not required; note that no change can be made to the 'latest version' filenames once established. Regards, Mary On 11/3/10 8:49 PM, "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> wrote: >On 11/3/2010 5:27 PM, Mary McRae wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Some answers inline. >> >> Regards, >> >> Mary >> >> >> >> >> On 11/3/10 6:42 PM, "Anish Karmarkar"<Anish.Karmarkar@Oracle.COM> >>wrote: >> >>> On the last call a question was asked about whether our current spec >>> filenames have to change given the new process and the move from >>>CD->CSD >>> >>> Per the Naming Directives doc >>> (http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives.html), >>> the file name should be as follows: >>> >>> [WP-abbrev][version-id]-[stage-abbrev][revisionNumber].[ext] >>> >>> For example our Java CAA spec would be: >>> sca-javacaa-v1.1csd06.pdf >>> >>> There are three differences from what we have now >>> (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd06.pdf): >>> 1) We use CD and not CSD. >> >>> >> As of 15 October 2010, CD is no longer a valid stage. Assuming the work >>is >> on the Standards Track, the appropriate approval stage is Committee >> Specification Draft, abbreviated CSD >> >> >>> If this is changed to CSD, a related question >>> is whether revisionNumbers would be continuation of our CD revision >>> number OR whether we would start from 01? >> >> CSD 15 Oct plus is equivalent to CD prior to 15 Oct. Continue with the >> numbering progression already in place. >> >>> 2) We do not use the character "v" before the version number. >>> 3) We use 'spec' in the filename (kinda redundant IMHO) >> >> Directory/filenames for specs that have already been uploaded at least >> once to docs.oasis-open.org will remain consistent with existing >>patterns. >> > >Thanks for the quick reply. > >WRT docs that have already been uploaded at least once, is it correct to >say that for the filenames: >we don't need to remove the 'spec' part from the file name but we do >need to change 'cd' to 'csd' and '1.1' to 'v1.1'? >OR >we don't need to change anything in the filenames. > >I do understand that the cover page has to say CSD and not CD for all >specs (regardless of whether they have been uploaded at least once or >not). > >-Anish >-- > >>> >>> -Anish >>> -- >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >>> >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]