[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] WD10 zip file
On 5/23/2011 2:37 AM, Mike Edwards wrote: > > Anish, > > No problem with the new WD10 and the re-approval. > > As for the new subdirectories > - I'm OK with the subdirectory for springci, > - but to have a further subdirectory for each csd seems overkill. > > We are switching from having one directory with a lot of files to the > opposite extreme of lots and lots of directories each > with very few files. The redundancy of the directory names and the names > of the files bothers me in this respect. I didn't notice the directories for individual CSD. I agree that this is perhaps an overkill. I would like the suggest the following: 1) not have individual subdirectories for each CSD 2) include the 'opencsa' part so all SCA specs/artifacts are available in the same subdirectory. 3) create a single subdirectory called 'sca-springci' that contains all the springci related artifacts. I don't think 'sca-springci-spec' name makes a lot of sense since we would have spec, tests, XSDs in that directory. 4) create a version-specific subdirectory underneath 'springci' for each version. So the URL for the spring CSD01 spec will look as follows: http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1/sca-springci-spec-v1.1-csd01.doc In fact, we could probably drop the 'sca' from 'sca-springci' subdirectory, making the URL a bit shorter: http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/springci/v1.1/sca-springci-spec-v1.1-csd01.doc I'll check with the TC Admin to see if this is acceptable. Please let me know what you think ASAP (even if it is 'don't care'). I would not like to delay publication because of this issue and would like to see if we can achieve consensus via email. Thanks. -Anish -- > > > Yours, Mike > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dr Mike Edwards Mail Point 137, Hursley Park > STSM Winchester, Hants SO21 2JN > SCA & Services Standards United Kingdom > Co-Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC > IBM Software Group > Phone: +44-1962 818014 > Mobile: +44-7802-467431 (274097) > e-mail: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com > > > > > > From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> > To: OASIS Java <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org> > Date: 20/05/2011 23:42 > Subject: [sca-j] WD10 zip file > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Hi, > > We approved WD09 as our CSD01 for Spring CI. The TC admin found a few > issues with it: > > 1) We approved the doc file, but we need to submit the doc file as well > as the XSD. It is best to get approval on the zip file that contain both. > 2) Since we approved the doc file, I had to create the zip file after > the fact and therefore the timestamps on the doc file in the zip is > different from the one we approved. > 3) The name of the xsd file in the appendix was sca-spring-extension.xsd > and if we are to stay inline with the SCA naming convention (eg SCA > BPEL) that we have adopted, it should be sca-spring-extensions.xsd (plural). > 4) We agreed to move to the new OASIS naming guidelines, therefore there > needs to be a "v" in the name of the file before the version number. > > I have fixed all the problems and created a WD10 zip file [1]. We should > approve the new WD10 as CSD01. If the TC blesses it, I'll update the > issues for creating CSD01 and PR01 with the new zip file. > > This assumes that the file name is sca-springci-v1.1-WD10. The other > option is sca-springci-spec-v1.1-WD10. We do use 'spec' in other SCA > specs, but I find it to be redundant (what else could it be other than a > spec?). Since we are moving away from old naming convention, I thought > it was a good time to remove the 'spec' part. But if the TC decides to > keep the 'spec' part we can change this. > > The other thing that we ought to discuss is creating subdirectories > under docs.oasis-open.org for our specs/XSD/jar files. Because of the > large number of specs and various CD/CSDs that this TC has to deal with, > as Robin had mentioned some time ago, it is increasingly getting messy. > Robin had suggested (and the new TC Admin Paul Knight has as well) > creating a 'springci' or a 'springci-spec' subdirectory. We also have to > figure out whether we want the subdirectory under 'opencsa' or not. So > there are four options for the URLs: > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-v1.1-csd01.doc > > or > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/sca-j/sca-springci-spec/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-spec-v1.1-csd01.doc > > or > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-v1.1-csd01.doc > > or > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci-spec/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-spec-v1.1-csd01.doc > > I like the third option the best. But we need to decide on this. I'll > put all of this on the agenda for monday. > > Thanks. > > -Anish > -- > > [1] > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42243/sca-springci-v1.1-WD10.zip > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > / > / > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/ > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]