[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Location of intents and policySets
At the start of Section 9, the Assembly spec says: 2934"There are a variety of SCA artifacts which are generally useful and which are not specific to a 2935 particular composite or a particular component. These shared artifacts include intents, policy sets, 2936 bindings, binding type definitions and implementation type definitions. 2937 All of these artifacts within an SCA Domain are defined in SCA contributions in files called METAINF/definitions.xml (relative to the contribution base URI). This is much too restrictive. Why do intents and policySets have to appear in a file? Intents and policySets are identified by QNames and we should use the normal QName/URI resolution mechanisms to locate them. This helps the separation of policy and executable code which is a desirable goal. Intents and policySets can be located in namespaces and the namespaces can be included in the domain. -- All the best, Ashok
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]