Re: Issue 16 - Targetting policySetsto binding.sca

[Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>]

Ashok,

I'm not sure that this is a valid issue
any more.  There is no such thing as a binding sub-element (no <soaphttp>
element) and so I think the issue should be closed as no longer applicable.

Regards, Simon

Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com

ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>

26/11/2007 18:20

Please respond to
ashok.malhotra@oracle.com

To	Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB
cc	OASIS Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	Issue 16 - Targetting policySetsto binding.sca

Hi Simon:
On today's SCA Policy TC Telcon we discussed issue 16 which you had 
raised.  This issue says:

Provide a consistent means of defining a policy that applies to certain
forms of WSDL binding irrespective of whether the binding is supplied in
a WSDL document or via a sub-binding element. Note that a policySets can
already target specific WSDL bindings, using XPath's document() 
function. The problem is that it is inconsistent with the XPath that 
would be written if, for example, <binding.ws><soaphttp> is
used to 
define the binding.

Since you were not on the call we did not make much progress on this issue.
Do you have a proposal?  Do you want to say a bit more about what
the 
problem is?
-- 
All the best, Ashok

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU