[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-policy] ISSUE 15: External Attachment - AI 20080331-01
Mike, Dave: You said: "The URI is constructed by recursively concatenating the component URI of each component in the implementation hierarchy above it." I don't understand how to concatenate URIs. Could you be more specific? Perhaps an example. Did you mean: myURI.parentURI.grandparentURI. ... Ashok Mike Edwards wrote: > > Folks, > > I can never resist a word-smithing challenge ;-) > > "All components will have an @uri attribute which contains the URI > of the component. The URI reflects a particular use of the component > - a component within a composite is potentially present multiple times > in the Domain, where its composite is used as an implementation > by more than one higher level component. The URI is constructed by > recursively concatenating the component URI of each component in the > implementation hierarchy above it. This makes it possible to write > XPath expressions that target a single instance of a nested component." > > > ...what provoked me to this rewording was that single word "buried" > towards the end of Dave's proposal, > which touched a nerve somewhere.... > > > Yours, Mike. > > Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO. > Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC. > IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain. > Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 > Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com > > > *David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>* > > 01/04/2008 16:29 > > > To > sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org > cc > > Subject > [sca-policy] ISSUE 15: External Attachment - AI 20080331-01 > > > > > > > > > > > I took an AI to resolve a seemingly minor wording problem in the current > Policy ISSUE 15 proposal. > > The paragraph in question is this: > > All components will have @uri attributes (not just domain-level > components), which contain the URI of the component. The URI will > contain path elements from all of the composites that the component > is embedded under. This makes it possible to write XPath expressions > that target a single buried component. > > The sentence in question is trying to say the component URI is constructed > by concatenating the component URI of each component in the implementation > hierarchy. So this leads me to: > > All components will have @uri attributes (not just domain-level > components), which contain the URI of the component. The URI is > constructed by recursively concatenating the component URI of each > component in the implementation hierarchy above it. This makes it > possible to write XPath expressions that target a single buried > component. > > > On the call we discussed the need for a short phrase or word that means 'a > component that is implemented by a composite'. Some suggestions have been > floated, none were good IMHO. I'm side stepping that discussion with this > proposal. :-) > > This complete my AI. > > > Dave Booz > STSM, SCA and WebSphere Architecture > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com > http://washome.austin.ibm.com/xwiki/bin/view/SCA2Team/WebHome > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in > OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > / > / > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU/ > > > > > > -- All the best, Ashok
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]