[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 15 -- referring to WSDL components
The assembly spec uses the following style to refer to WSDL components - wsdl.endpoint(MyValueService/MyValueServiceSOAP) - wsdl.interface(StockQuote) This follows the style of naming WSDL components advocated in Appendix A of the WSDL 2.0 spec http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#wsdl-iris WS-Policy created a similar naming scheme for WSDL 1.1 components. This is described in http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl11elementidentifiers-20070720/ These naming schemes use IRIs for interface components rather than XPaths. In the proposal we discussed for the domain infoset we copy the children of the portType and then use XPath to navigate to one or more of them. I'm wondering if we should copy the entire WSDL definition and use the IRI identification style for a) consistency b) following a standard. -- All the best, Ashok
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]