NEW ISSUE: POL30023 should not be a conformance statement

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

TARGET: SCA Policy Spec (PRD)

DESCRIPTION:
While writing a test assertion for POL30023, it became clear that this statement might be better phrased as a non-conformance statement given it's definitional nature.

Two intents MUST be treated as mutually exclusive when any of the following are true:

- One of the two intents lists the other intent in its @excludes list.

- Both intents list the other intent in their respective @excludes list.
[POL30023]

PROPOSAL:
Rephrase as:

Two intents are mutually exclusive when any of the following are true:

- One of the two intents lists the other intent in its @excludes list.

- Both intents list the other intent in their respective @excludes list.



Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com