Re: [sca-policy] NEW ISSUE: Clarify meaning of 'does not have tosupport intents' in Conformance section

[ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>]

Thanks, Dave!
I believe this is closely related to 
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-79
Don't think we need a new issue to cover this.
All the best, Ashok


David Booz wrote:
>
> TARGET: SCA Policy FW spec CD02/PR01
>
> DESCRIPTION:
> Section 11 Conformance states (line 2346):
> 'The implementation does not have to support any intents listed in 
> this specification, and MAY reject SCDL documents that contain them.'
>
> Also consider that POL30024 says the following:
> 'An SCA Runtime MUST include in the Domain the set of intent 
> definitions contained in the Policy_Intents_Definitions.xml described 
> in the appendix "Intent Definitions" of the SCA Policy specification.'
>
> What does it mean to support an intent? Section 11 needs to be clarified.
>
> PROPOSAL:
> None.
>
>
> This completes my outstanding AI: 20090727-01: status=pending: Dave to 
> raise an issue against the Policy spec to deal with the inconsistency 
> relating to the support of intents.
>
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
>