Dave Booz: Agenda SCA Policy Telecon - Aug 24 2009
Callin Number: See below
1. Roll call
2. Confirm minute taker
3. Agenda bashing
4. Meeting Minutes
Vote to accept minutes from Aug 17 2009
5. TC Administrivia:
a. Recording issue status - 9 Open
6. PRD status update
a. 9 issues from PR 01 comment list that need responses
7. ACTION ITEMS:
a. 20090706-01: status=pending; Mike E: Prepare an updated version of the Specification containing the resolution of Issue 95
b. 20090810-01: status=pending; Ashok to prepare words for the resolution of Issue 79
8. New Issues
none
9. Blocking Issue Discussion
None
10. Testing Discussion
a. Test assertion document status
11. Additional Issue Discussion
a. ISSUE 97: Suggestion to address suspected default/unqualified intent ambiguity
Pending wording from Rich and Ashok
b. ISSUE 79: Do intents have to be supported if only External Attachment supported?
c. ISSUE 87: Clarification re. values of @appliesTo.
d. ISSUE 94: Allow intents to be attached using an element
e. ISSUE 93: Allow external attachment for intents
f. ISSUE 92: Block Intent Inheritance
g. ISSUE 90: Fine-grained authorization
h. ISSUE 89: Location of intents and policySets
i. ISSUE 104: Clarify meaning of 'does not have to support intents' in Conformance section
12. AOB
a. straggler role
Plamen: Scribe: Plamen
Plamen: 3. Agenda bashing
Plamen: 4. Meeting Minutes
Bob I just joined, sory for my tardiness
Plamen: accepted without objections
Plamen: 5. TC Administrivia:
Ashok Martin I added you to the attendance
Plamen: 7. ACTION ITEMS:
Plamen: both action items still pending
Plamen: 8. New Issues
none
9. Blocking Issue Discussion
None
Plamen: 10. Testing Discussion
no updates
Plamen: 11. Additional Issue Discussion
Rich will send draft to Ashok later today
Plamen: Ashok describes the problem
Plamen: Ashok: motion to close Policy-89 with no action
Plamen: Rich seconds
Plamen: motion passes with no objections
Plamen: policy-89 is closed with no action
Plamen: Ashok walk us through
Ashok Bob, I added you to the roll
Plamen: Askok wonders whether policy-90 is not overtaken by another issue
Plamen: Ashok moves to accept the proposal in the Jira to remove the fineGrain from authorization intent
Plamen: Rich seconds
Plamen: motion passes without objections
Plamen: Ashok describes the issue
Plamen: Dave we need to change the syntax of the example
Plamen: Rich why XPath is needed
Plamen: Ashok describes the reason
Plamen: Action: Ashok to provide wording to resolve issue policy-87
Plamen: Ashok asks whether this is covered by 79
Mike Edwards: Greetings
Plamen: AOB
Plamen: straggler role
Plamen: Next 2 calls are canceled
Plamen: next tel. conf will be after 3 weeks