sdd message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sdd] 2.13.3
- From: "Robert Dickau" <rdickau@macrovision.com>
- To: "Patton, John H" <John.Patton@ca.com>,<sdd@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:26:58 -0600
This rewording is much clearer.
I now read the requirement to mean that one (the install
operator?) can specify "fall back to Esperanto content when the
hosting environment's locale isn't specifically included".
Predictably, I'd prefer "must
support definition of a default locale" to "support defining a default locale";
and would a phrase like "fallback locale" be more appropriate than "default
locale" to emphasize the intent of the requirement?
(Looking at it, though, it
doesn't seem much different from the previous req 2.13.2, which states the
install operator should be able to view content in other than the target's
locale.)
I believe this meets
the spirit of the original.
Suggestion:
2.13.3
The SDD specification must support defining a default locale to be used
in hosting environments where localized content is unavailable or has
not been defined for the hosting
environment's locale.
Original:
2.13.3 The SDD specification must support the
ability for the author to define the localized content which should run properly
on all locale-specific versions of supported operating systems.
Thoughts?
/john
patton/
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]