RE: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification Draft.doc) uploaded

[Brent Miller <bamiller@us.ibm.com>]

Just to amplify Debra's call for e-mail
participation:

We agreed during today's SDD telecon
to, for the time being, repeat the nascent process begun last week for
specification review. Briefly, that consists of:

• identifying comments via e-mail
• Julia will "triage" the comments via e-mail reply, identifying those that can be handled in a straightforward manner vs. those that merit group discussion in a conference call
• We'll devote sufficient time in future conference calls to discussing those items that "bubble up" for group discussion

I think we can strike a balance between
e-mail and telecon discussion with this process. We want to avoid both
inbox clutter and unproductive discussions during the telecons. Of course
we will ensure that all comments are addressed, but we have a lot of work
ahead of us and want to do this as productively as possible.

We will revisit the process once we
have a couple weeks' experience with it (and at that time we probably need
to revisit our project plan also).

In the meantime, additional suggestions
and ideas are welcome.

Thanks. 

Regards,
Brent

Brent A. Miller
STSM, Autonomic Computing Architecture
IBM Corp.
Tel. 919-543-6959 (TIE 441)

"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
in practice, there is." 
-- Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

"Danielson, Debra J" <Debra.Danielson@ca.com>

06/06/2006 02:10 PM

To	<sdd@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification Draft.doc) uploaded

My comments on this section (excluding the items still
open from the
previous review).  I will not be able to attend the call tomorrow
am, as
I am out of the office, so please respond via email.

Thanks, 
Debra

Section 2

Informational question?  What's the value of the size attribute?

Section 2.1

Re: The length of the shortDescription is not restricted, should it be?


                
We do not have explicit limits for tool tip information in CA,
but only suggest "short phrases".

Under optional information there is a section on the Version and the Fix
elements, but that isn't represented in the schema above - which is
correct?

Section 2.2

No comments.

Section 2.3

Is this directly from the ACS specification?

Section 2.4

No comments.



Regards,
Debra

-----Original Message-----
From: julia@us.ibm.com [mailto:julia@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 5:28 PM
To: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification
Draft.doc) uploaded

***Please review section 2 in this document and discuss issues via
email.***

This version contains the group 1 sections reworked based on the ACS
alignment. Note that most of the content of the submission draft outline
has been stripped out to make this simpler to review. 

 -- Ms. Julia McCarthy

The document revision named SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification
Draft.doc) has been submitted by Ms. Julia McCarthy to the OASIS
Solution Deployment Descriptor (SDD) TC document repository.  This
document is revision #1 of SDD Specification Draft.doc.

Document Description:
The current draft of the SDD Specification for internal TC review.

View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sdd/document.php?document_i
d=18517

Download Document:  
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sdd/download.php/18517/SDD%
20Specification%20Draft.doc

Revision:
This document is revision #1 of SDD Specification Draft.doc.  The
document details page referenced above will show the complete revision
history.


PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email
application may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be
able
to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your
web browser.

-OASIS Open Administration