Re: [sdd] [glossary] Initial vs. Default Configuration

[James Falkner <james.falkner@sun.com>]

Ok, then I make a motion (can I do that via email?) to include all
three definitions in the glossary.  If required, I can do this at
the next concall.

-jhf-

Julia McCarthy wrote:
> The SDD does provide a way to indicate default configuration values. I 
> think it is useful to have all three terms in the glossary.
> 
> Julia McCarthy
> Tivoli Development
> Deployment Engine Design
> julia@us.ibm.com
> 349/8156
> 877-261-0391
> 
> 
> 
> Inactive hide details for James Falkner <james.falkner@sun.com>James 
> Falkner <james.falkner@sun.com>
> 
> 
>                         *James Falkner <james.falkner@sun.com>*
> 
>                         06/07/2006 02:27 PM
> 
> 	
> 
> To
> 	
> sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> cc
> 	
> 
> Subject
> 	
> [sdd] [glossary] Initial vs. Default Configuration
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> For my current action item:
> 
> "James Falkner to check on glossary discussion to see if Initial 
> Configuration
> should be deprecated (thought either this or default configuration was 
> retained)."
> 
> In the current glossary, we define "Configuration", and "Initial
> Configuration".  I could not find any notes in deprecating the
> definition of Initial Configuration, and in the F2F minutes, there
> was no discussion of this.  I also do not recall ever talking about
> getting rid of Initial Configuration.
> 
> I believe definitions for Initial and Default configuraitons are useful.
> 
> Since we already have definitions for Configuration and Initial
> Configuration, all we need is Default Configuration.
> 
> "Default Configuration" is the configuration supplied by the solution
> provider.  Doesn't SDD contain default values for configurable
> parameters? If so, this should be in the glossary.  If not, I think
> it is not necessary.
> 
> -jhf-
>