sdd message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sdd] F2F Action item: New wording for Completion usage note
- From: Randy George <randyg@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Merri Jensen" <Merri.Jensen@sas.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:31:23 -0500
Merri,
I like this. I would change
to MUST. FYI...this is more than "requires". It could
be "provides". Thus, we need to state that if the artifact
"executes" a system operation or "requires" a "system
operation" to complete the deployment of the contents in the artifact.
Regards,
Randy George
Senior Technical Staff Member
Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group
Austin, TX
(512) 838-0752 T/L 678-0752
"Merri Jensen"
<Merri.Jensen@sas.com>
10/31/07 06:09 PM
|
To
| Randy George/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Julia
McCarthy/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| <sdd@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| RE: [sdd] F2F Action item: New wording
for Completion usage note |
|
How about something like:
A Completion element SHOULD (MUST?)
be included if the artifact being processed requires a system operation
such as a reboot or logoff to occur in order to function successfully.
-Merri
From: Randy George [mailto:randyg@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:23 PM
To: Julia McCarthy
Cc: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [sdd] F2F Action item: New wording for Completion usage
note
This sounds like good content to be in the intro section for completions...but
not a usage note.
Also, I like declaration more than definition..for you are declaring that
this is needed or will happen.
Regards,
Randy George
Senior Technical Staff Member
Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group
Austin, TX
(512) 838-0752 T/L 678-0752
Julia McCarthy/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
10/31/07 01:51 PM
|
To
| sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [sdd] F2F Action item: New wording for Completion
usage note |
|
We said at the F2F that we wanted to remove the usage note from Completion
and replace it with something better. I got the todo. Specifically, we
are talking about new wording for Completion element usage notes in InstallableUnitType,
ConfigurationUnitType and LocalizationUnitType.
Old: : If completion actions are associated
with one or more of the deployment operations supported by the defined
artifacts, they MUST be described in Completion elements.
Proposed New: A Completion definition can serve as a warning to consumers
that an artifact will perform a reboot or logoff. Alternatively, it can
alert consumers that the results of artifact processing will not be functional
until a reboot or logoff has been performed.
TC members, if you have comments and make them via email, it will save
us time during meetings.
Merri, you can include the new wording in the draft and cross the following
items off the outstanding todos list:
4.3.1.2 InstallableUnitType.Completion - Julia to provide new content
4.3.2.2 ConfigurationUnitType.Completion - Julia to provide new content
(4.9.2.2 LocalizationUnitType.Completion - this was not on the list, but
it also needs to be changed.)
Julia McCarthy
julia@us.ibm.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]