[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sdo] Proposal for Static SDOs
Hi Ron, Regarding the package name to/from URI mapping, your document says they're the same value, but that won't work. For example: "http://a/b/c" is not a valid package name. I thought we were thinking about using the JAX-B mapping rule for URI -> package name. In the other direction (package name -> URI) JAX-B just uses "" for the URI by default (if there is no annotation). Is that what we want to do as well? I heard that the WebBeans spec is proposing a Java to XML namespace mapping of the following form: " urn:java:<package qualified Java Class>". Seems kind of strange, but maybe it's a good idea to make SDO3 and WebBeans behave in the same way. Frank "Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> 02/09/2009 06:52 AM To <sdo@lists.oasis-open.org> cc Subject [sdo] Proposal for Static SDOs <<Proposal for Static SDOs.doc>> <<Static SDO.ppt>> Hi Everyone, Here is the proposed wording for Chapter 3 of the Java Spec, and a PPT describing what I think are the highlights and main discussion points of the proposal. Comments of course welcome. Hopefully, everyone will have time to review this before next weeks virtual F2F. Ron [attachment "Proposal for Static SDOs.doc" deleted by Frank Budinsky/Toronto/IBM] [attachment "Static SDO.ppt" deleted by Frank Budinsky/Toronto/IBM] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]