[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [search-ws] "exact" gone as a relation in CQL 1.2????
See: http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/resources/cql-context-set-v1-2.html RELATIONS: "Note:
the relations 'scr' and 'exact' have been replaced by '=' and '=='," From: LeVan,Ralph
[mailto:levan@oclc.org] Mike’s new parser insists that “exact” is not a relation in
verion 1.2. Can this possibly be true? If so, why? I’ve got
zillions of clients that think “exact” is the relation to be using. What
should the be using instead? Puzzled. Ralph |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]