[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [search-ws] queryn: Some further comments
From: Matthew Dovey [mailto:m.dovey@jisc.ac.uk] > i) we agree that we change the spec to allow the value queryType to > determine which parameter(s) contain the query. The default is that the > query will be passed via a parameter called "query", but a specific > queryType can specify otherwise. That's where we were when we were still debating the usefulness of the queryN parameter. I believe we now agree on it's usefulness, and so I suggest that the presence of queryN signals this alternative way of passing query information, and therefore there a new query type isn't needed. > ii) the status of this queryType - normative, non-normative but > included in spec; Nature specific extension etc. I would favour that > this is at least a non-normative part of the spec. We are crafting a solution that proposes first class SRU parameters. I don't see how that can be anything but normative. --Ray
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]