[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Website maintainer?
At 05:10 PM 1/26/01 -0800, Jeff Hodges wrote:
>Can we point to some existing pages as models for what we're imagining?
>
>How about these..
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/registryandrepositorycommittee.shtml
>
>..as models?
>
>What is the minimum page layout complexity? (I personally don't think we need
>anything fancy at all to accomplish our work, and that these pages shouldn't
>have a "marketing" requirement on them. See
>http://www.stanford.edu/~hodges/LDUP/ for an example of what I'm imagining
>as a
>very-bare-bones-yet-useful working group page.
>http://www.phys.uu.nl/~wwwfi/aaaarch/ is an example of something a bit more
>"fancy" but still pretty low-key, to the point, and probably not terribly
>complex to maintain.)
My opinion: Very simple. This is for information transfer, to the public
as well as for our own use.
>Where will the SSTC site/pages be hosted? At www.oasis-open.org like the
>above TCs?
Yes. We get this "free" for having a TC.
>How many "cooks" will be trying to stir this broth? How much time is the
>maintainer going to have to spend consensus-building and hand-holding?
>Will the maintainer be expected to create any and all pages on request? If
>so, by whom?
I would suggest that the overall maintainer create/maintain only the pages
that apply to the whole TC; they can create a sub-area for each subgroup,
within which that subgroup can do whatever they want. We just need to FTP
some pages into place.
> > - Occasionally creating new pages (e.g., technical/PR contact lists)
>
>What's "occasionally"? How many updates & new pages per week (let's say)?
I would say: In the first month, ten pages with significant content. After
that, maybe one a week. Updates to keep the links fresh probably every week.
Time required in the first month: maybe 4 hrs/wk. After that: maybe 1 hr/wk.
> > Optional:
> > - Neat-o "look" for the site
>
>Who decides what constitutes a "neat-o look"?
>Models?
> http://www.s2ml.org/ ?
> http://www.authxml.org/ ?
>
>How much work is it to maintain pages like these? I.e. how much work is it to
>add new subpages and update navigation bars appropriately?
I was thinking of the W3C DOM Group site (W3C member only), which has a
"weasel" as a logo! :-)
> > - Very active maintenance of content and layout
>
>What constitutes "very active"? How many updates & new pages per week (let's
>say)?
If someone likes generating web pages with a custom tool for no good
reason, or likes to "style" web pages, I don't necessarily want to stand in
their way. But I just want a functional, accurate site; plainness is not a
negative and I don't need dynamic content or anything. The DocBook site is
nice (and I happen to know it's generated from XML); if someone wants the
tools to do this, I can point them in the right direction.
Eve
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ east.sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC