[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: What shall we name our specification(s)?
My
objection to A2ML was that specifying Authentication in the name to me implies
that we would be supporting authenticated key exchange, which is something I
don't want to do in an OASIS group, that is something I would prefer to do in a
closed group of cryptographers and network security protocol
engineers.
On the
other hand "Authorization Assertion Markup Language" would have the initials
A2ML, thus indicating the warm touchy feely get together vibes people want,
being clearly a descendent of S2ML and Auth XML (whose current voting success I
take note of).
Does
anyone else have definite feelings towards the binding of the second
A?
Phill
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC