RE: Agenda for SSTC/Focus 15 May 2001 telecon

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Hi,

	Looks like there had been a coup on the conformance group :-( and Tim has
taken over :-)

	Anyway, I will be presenting at XML One Tomorrow 9:00-12:00 Central and so
won't be able to make it for the concall. Hopefully, Heather will not throw
me out :-)

	Conformance Group Report :

		None to report. Plan to have the strawperson conformance section by next
fortnight. We are concentrating on defining the levels of conformance.

cheers


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@east.sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:30 AM
> To: security-services@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Agenda for SSTC/Focus 15 May 2001 telecon
>
>
> Meeting date: Tuesday, 15 May 2000
> Meeting time ( see also http://www.timezoneconverter.com ):
>
>          (TC meeting ~first hour; Focus meeting ~second hour)
>          Europe/Dublin  5-7pm
>          US/Eastern     12noon-2pm
>          US/Central     11am-1pm
>          US/Pacific     9am-11am
>
> Call-in information (good through 17 July):
>          Call-in number: (334) 262-0740
>          Participant code #856956
>
>
> Administrative
> ==============
> - Membership report: new/removed members (Heather)
> - Roll call (Heather)
> - Approval of minutes for F2F #2:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200105/msg0
> 0006.html
> - Approval of minutes for the last telecon:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200105/msg0
> 0040.html
> - Approval of/additions to this agenda
>
>
> Review the running list of open ACTION items
> ============================================
> ACTION: Bob Blakley to develop and circulate a Word template for all
> specification contributors to use.
>
> ACTION: Bob Blakley to work with Phill Hallam-Baker to develop the
> simplified architectural model and coordinate it with the proposed
> Core Assertions design.
>
> ACTION: Bob Griffin to attempt to map the proposed Core Assertions
> design to our requirements.  To be done by 11 May.
>
> ACTION: Hal Lockhart to publish a fresh issues list.  To be done by 8 May.
>
> ACTION: Hal Lockhart and Dave Orchard to update the Architectural
> chapter to reflect F2F #2 decisions.  Hal to update his picture
> today.  Dave O to update whole chapter by 11 May.
>
> ACTION: Jeff Hodges to update the Glossary to reflect F2F #2
> decisions.  To
> be done by 11 May.
>
> ACTION: Darren Platt to update the requirements document to reflect F2F
> #2 decisions and publish as a consensus draft ASAP.
>
>
> Review plans for F2F #3
> =======================
> - Evite poll results
> - If we don't reach quorum, is a Focus subcommittee meeting acceptable?
> - Goals for this F2F:
>      . Review and approve as much of the design as possible
>      . Assess plans for implementation and conformance
>      . Figure out the end-game schedule
>
>
> Subcommittee reports
> ====================
> - Focus (Eve)
> - Sessions (Hal)
> - Bindings (Prateek)
> - Conformance (Tim)
> - Considerations (Jeff)
>
>
> Liaison reports
> ===============
> ...
>
>
> Technical issues to discuss/approve
> ===================================
> - Focus subcommittee recommendations:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200105/msg0
> 0051.html
>
>    . "We recommend that the TC authorize a subgroup/task force to
>      evaluate a suitable pass-through authN solution for eventual
>      inclusion in V.next of SAML. If the TC likes the design once it
>      is presented, it may choose to open up its scope to once again
>      include pass-through authN in V1.0. Stephen is willing to champion
>      this."
>
>    . "Direct the editor of the requirements document to indicate that
>       we desire a design where signatures and encryption are optional."
>
>
> Open mike (new issues)
> ======================
> ...
>
>
> **Adjourn**
>
>
> Focus subcommittee agenda
> =========================
> The following list is from Hal, our issues list maintainer.  Please see
> recent discussion on security-services and Phill's new version of
> the core
> assertions draft:
>
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/docs/draft-sstc-core-06.pdf
>
> - XMLAssertionGenerality (aka "top vs. bottom")
>
> - Enveloped and Enveloping (and Detached)
>    Open - recommend discussion in context e.g. Prateek's thread
> re: "binding"
>
> - Wildcarded Resources
>    Open
>
> - NoPolicyAssertions
>    Open - do we really want to debate this?
>
> - OptionalSigAndEncryption
>    Open - What's the alternative? None? Mandatory?
>
> - R-Reference
> - R-Extensible
>    Open - suggest discussion in context
>
> - StrengthenAddDeleteMod
> - UC-2-01:AddPolicyAssertions
>    Open
>
> - UC-2-05: Emarketplace Use Case
>    Open - Ballot 7-4
>
> - UC-9-01:RuntimePrivacy
> - UC-9-02:PrivacyStatement
>    Open
>
> - SAMLVersions
>    Agreed SAML will have version # in header, technical means no settled
>
> - CertsVsPasswords
>    Open - consensus = support both?
>
> - PropagateIDAssertions
>    Open - We want to be able to propagate identity assertions, and to
>    propagate privileges into other environments. Bob Griffin
>
>
> - UC-1-05:FirstContact
>    Open - ballot 6-3 Issue seems to be not whether to allow, but whether
>    to call out specifically
>
> - PassportHailstorm
>    Open
>
> - SubjectDefinition
>    Open - being discussed on list
>
> - ObjectDefinition
>    Open
>
> - XMLEncoding
>    Open
>
> - URIsForAssertionIDs
>    Open
> --
> Eve Maler                                             +1 781 442 3190
> Sun Microsystems XML Technology Development  eve.maler @ east.sun.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to:
> security-services-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>