[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [Issue] ClockSkew
TRUE! -----Original Message----- From: christopher ferris To: Hal Lockhart Cc: 'Simon Y. Blackwell'; 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' Sent: 6/5/01 7:51 AM Subject: Re: [Issue] ClockSkew Agreed. Hal Lockhart wrote: > > I think it would be far superior to require (strongly recommend) that NTP be > implemented than invent some kind of poor man's NTP. > > Hal > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Y. Blackwell [mailto:sblackwell@psoom.com] > > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:55 PM > > To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' > > Subject: RE: [Issue] ClockSkew > > > > > > Although this would by no means solve all the issues with > > skew, could it not > > be the case that PEPs or PDPs could volunteer their > > respective times to each > > other so that they could at least resolve any bi-lateral skew? > > <snip/>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC