[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: SSTC/Focus 12 June 2001 telecon - Conformance Group Status
Hi, Here is a very preliminary cut at the conformance clause. Would like to get a sanity check feedback. I really think the conformance clause and the conformance nomenclature should be very simple as the readers of those would be business and other non-technical users. So the clause would not have the dazzle of the other sections :-( In addition to the conformance clause (which would be part of the specification) we would have a SAML conformance program document and possibly a SAML certification document. Bob Griffin is working on both - Bob, please feel free to add your comments on the state of those docs. Due to legal responsibilities, the certification is an issue. From our con calls and my (e-mail) talks with Karl, we could provide conformance guidelines, develop documents describing the tests and even write test code. But we might not be able to do the actual certification. A related issue is the interoperability - conformance even though necessary, is not a sufficient condition for interoperability. Naturally these issues would be dealt with in the (separate) conformance program document while keeping the conformance clause (in the specification) as simple as possible. I would like to get ideas, comments, wisdom, ... on these issues. cheers
SAMLConformance Clause-004.pdf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC