[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference?
Prateek, As I had mentioned earlier, I also have a dev track proposal. Mine and Jason's need to be reconciled, if they select both. May be they will accept only one, who knows. I was going to concentrate on web services and possibly exchanging context as session assertions. cheers |-----Original Message----- |From: ROUAULT,JASON (HP-FtCollins,ex1) [mailto:jason_rouault@hp.com] |Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:24 PM |To: Mishra, Prateek; 'Krishna Sankar'; Jeremy Epstein; Jahan Moreh; |ROUAULT,JASON (HP-FtCollins,ex1); oasis sstc; 'pbaker@verisign.com' |Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference? | | |Prateek, | |Yes, I have already submitted for the Developer's Track. | |Jason | |-----Original Message----- |From: Mishra, Prateek [mailto:pmishra@netegrity.com] |Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:16 PM |To: 'Krishna Sankar'; Jeremy Epstein; Jahan Moreh; ROUAULT,JASON |(HP-FtCollins,ex1); Mishra, Prateek; oasis sstc; 'pbaker@verisign.com' |Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference? | | |Folks, | |In conversation with Carlisle Adams, we came up with the following |suggestions: | |(1) Standards Track Presentation (not a panel) |Intro to SAML standard effort, use-cases, architecture, standards status. | |(2) Developers Track Presentation (not a panel) |How developers can use SAML in their programs, develop security services, |available SAML APIs. | |(3) XML Security standards presentation/panel |(proposed by Philip H-B. so lets ask him to drive this one). | |One reason to avoid a panel is that frankly it will take 30-40 minutes |of a good presentation to get the main points across. The main idea of |a panel is to expose different viewpoints, that does not seem helpful |for (1) and (2). | |Following Jeremy's suggestion, the main coordination point is not to |have too many presentations on the same topic. Therefore, I am requesting |folks to coordinate by NOT sending in many submissions on these topics. | |It appears that submissions on (1) and (2) have already been made to RSA? |IF not, we should make sure that there are some submissions in |by July 15. | |Jahan: I believe you have made a submission on the standards |track for SAML. |Could you please confirm that? | |Krishna, Jason: Have you guys submitted on the dev track? | |In that case, I would propose we make no further submissions on |these topics |(this has nothing to do with various corporate submissions you may be |making). | |I would also request the submitters for (1) and (2) to review |their slides |(several people would be happy to help with the contents) |with the group AND highlight all of the companies participating in SAML |at OASIS. | | |- prateek | | |>>-----Original Message----- |>>From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com] |>>Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:53 PM |>>To: Jeremy Epstein; Jahan Moreh; ROUAULT,JASON (HP-FtCollins,ex1); |>>Mishra, Prateek; oasis sstc |>>Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference? |>> |>> |>>Hi, |>> Good point. My suggestion is to have one standards |>>track, one developers |>>track and of course mention SAML in product talks as needed |>>by the various |>>vendors. |>> |>>Would this be a better plan of action ? Or do we want only |>>one standards |>>track or just one developers track ? |>> |>>cheers |>> |>> |-----Original Message----- |>> |From: Jeremy Epstein [mailto:jepstein@webmethods.com] |>> |Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:04 PM |>> |To: Jahan Moreh; Krishna Sankar; ROUAULT,JASON (HP-FtCollins,ex1); |>> |Mishra, Prateek; oasis sstc |>> |Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference? |>> | |>> | |>> |Not trying to tell anyone what to do, but.... do you think |>>you'd stand a |>> |better chance of getting SAML accepted on the agenda if |>>there were one or |>> |more *joint* proposals, instead of a bunch of individual |>>ones? Will the |>> |conference team say "we can't pick which one, so let's |>>reject them all"? |>> |Based on last year, my gut feeling is that they're not |>>going to accept a |>> |whole bunch of SAML presentations... so a consortium |>>approach might be a |>> |reasonable compromise. |>> | |>> |Just a thought... |>> |--Jeremy |>> | |>> | |>> |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC