[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Seen In the Press
Some weeks ago we were called upon to elect a new chairperson (or co-chairpersons, as it were), following Eve's resignation. Right before the vote took place, Securant's Darryl Platt made a remark cautioning people that voting for the Netegrity representative (Prateek Mishra) would be dangerous because Netegrity would claim to have invented SAML (I don't recall Darryl's exact words, so I'm not quoting him). At the time, much to the amazement of my colleagues on the call, I decided not to address Darryl's unfair (and unfounded) remark. Before and after the election of our new co-chairpersons, I've had the privilege to present SAML in several European countries (sometimes in a foreign language) in addition to the US, on behalf of my company. We've never made the claim that SAML was Netegrity's invention, as Darryl would have it. However, in this week's issue of Infoworld, Brian Fonseca reported on Web Services security mentioning Netegrity, Securant, and Oblix ("Aegis forged for Web services", Infoworld 07.23.01, p. 22). Here is a passage of that article: "Securant helped pioneer the AuthXML standards proposal, which eventually became the Web security standard SAML [...]." Since I don't believe Fonseca made that up, "somebody" had to tell him! I think it's fair for a company to take some of the credit for SAML, and Securant can certainly do that because they have contributed quite a lot to the standard, as others have. However, I don't think Darryl's earlier remark was judicious in light of this recent article. I know that we all love to hate an undisputed market leader, but we also all need to practice what we preach... Marc Chanliau Sr. Product Manager Netegrity, Inc.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC