[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Bindings sub-group report to TC
In the discussions of the bindings sub-group, two issues of broader interest to the TC have come up: (1) Will SAML provide some way of "box-carring" or carrying multiple requests in a single "message" (also multiple responses)? Should this be resolved at the core assertion level or should it be dealt with in specific bindings? (2) There is a need to characterize use of XML-DSIG for SAML assertions, requests and responses. This could also be termed a SAML profile for XML-DSIG. Some issues: are all three forms of signing supported (detached, enveloped, enveloping)? Are all the varied types of KeyInfo sub-elements supported? If a SAML response is signed, then under what conditions does the signature "apply" to any assertions contained within the response? Evan Prodromou has volunteered to take this issue forward. - prateek
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC