[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code
I think it came off the whiteboard. I would very much like to rename it, AuthenticationMethod sounds good to me. I think we should also rename the protocol element in <Authenticator> to be the same. [We can also change authenticator but that is another story and first someone needs to come up with a better name, HolderOfKey being worse] Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng. Principal Scientist VeriSign Inc. pbaker@verisign.com 781 245 6996 x227 > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@entegrity.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:29 PM > To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' > Subject: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code > > > I was wondering why the term "Authentication Code" was chosen for the > consensus schema. I thought we had been using "Authentication > Method" a term > that seems more intuitive to me. > > Hal > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
Phillip Hallam-Baker (E-mail).vcf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC