[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code
Actually, I was trying to avoid admitting in public that I have no idea what "<Protocol>" is supposed to be used for, so "yes" would be an answer I could live with if no one has a good idea.... --bob Bob Blakley (email: blakley@us.tivoli.com phone: +1 512 436 1564) Chief Scientist, Security and Privacy, Tivoli Systems, Inc. "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> on 08/20/2001 03:45:03 PM Please respond to "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> To: George Robert Blakley III/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com> cc: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'" <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code The bigger issue is whether <Protocol> and <AuthenticationMethod> are the same element (Say yes). Phill Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng. Principal Scientist VeriSign Inc. pbaker@verisign.com 781 245 6996 x227 > -----Original Message----- > From: George Robert Blakley III [mailto:blakley@us.tivoli.com] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:36 PM > To: Hal Lockhart > Cc: 'Hallam-Baker, Phillip'; 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' > Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code > > > I agree "authn method" is better. In fact, I remember > complaining about > authn type even as I was writing it down. > > > --bob > > Bob Blakley (email: blakley@us.tivoli.com phone: +1 512 436 1564) > Chief Scientist, Security and Privacy, Tivoli Systems, Inc. > > > Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com> on 08/20/2001 02:36:39 PM > > To: "'Hallam-Baker, Phillip'" <pbaker@verisign.com>, > "'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'" > <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org> > cc: > Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code > > > > Actually, I checked and the whiteboard transcription says > "AuthN type". I > consider AuthN Method to be preferable. > > Hal > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:pbaker@verisign.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:48 PM > > To: 'Hal Lockhart'; 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' > > Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code > > > > > > I think it came off the whiteboard. > > > > I would very much like to rename it, AuthenticationMethod > > sounds good to me. > > I think we should also rename the protocol element in > > <Authenticator> to be > > the same. > > > > [We can also change authenticator but that is another story > and first > > someone needs to come up with a better name, HolderOfKey > being worse] > > > > Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng. > > Principal Scientist > > VeriSign Inc. > > pbaker@verisign.com > > 781 245 6996 x227 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@entegrity.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:29 PM > > > To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org' > > > Subject: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code > > > > > > > > > I was wondering why the term "Authentication Code" was > > chosen for the > > > consensus schema. I thought we had been using "Authentication > > > Method" a term > > > that seems more intuitive to me. > > > > > > Hal > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC